Is Lamont a boy or girl name?
Lamont is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 51 boys were named Lamont, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 24,140 US babies named Lamont were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,607
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lamont since 1888
- 24,140
- Most popular year
- 1972
- 1,060 babies
Boys and girls named Lamont, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 161 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 363 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,217 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 2,131 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,317 | 34 | 1% |
| 1970s | 6,673 | 114 | 1.7% |
| 1980s | 3,447 | 17 | 0.5% |
| 1990s | 2,751 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,982 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,291 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 350 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51 | #2,607 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 59 | #2,351 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 82 | #1,914 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 70 | #2,088 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 88 | #1,755 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 82 | #1,842 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 84 | #1,816 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 110 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 116 | #1,480 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 121 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 136 | #1,304 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 137 | #1,273 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 159 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 172 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 174 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 182 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 210 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 224 | #896 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 190 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 165 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 185 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 214 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 187 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 211 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 214 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 228 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 225 | #730 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 226 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 222 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 272 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 285 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 323 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 342 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 314 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 314 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 332 | #526 | 6 | #11,631 |
| 1988 | 307 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 299 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 326 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 292 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 320 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 317 | #470 | 5 | #11,151 |
| 1982 | 368 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 402 | #412 | 6 | #9,751 |
| 1980 | 484 | #364 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 521 | #346 | 11 | #5,951 |
| 1978 | 541 | #323 | 10 | #6,171 |
| 1977 | 531 | #337 | 5 | #10,451 |
| 1976 | 599 | #300 | 7 | #7,716 |
| 1975 | 659 | #291 | 13 | #4,724 |
| 1974 | 824 | #243 | 10 | #5,561 |
| 1973 | 900 | #234 | 21 | #3,176 |
| 1972 | 1,040 | #214 | 20 | #3,227 |
| 1971 | 524 | #350 | 9 | #5,775 |
| 1970 | 534 | #352 | 8 | #6,078 |
| 1969 | 443 | #372 | 9 | #5,256 |
| 1968 | 423 | #377 | 7 | #5,933 |
| 1967 | 375 | #390 | 5 | #7,316 |
| 1966 | 342 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 336 | #424 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 340 | #433 | 6 | #6,399 |
| 1963 | 293 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 268 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 272 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 225 | #528 | 7 | #5,443 |
| 1959 | 252 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 233 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 225 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 202 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 206 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 232 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 201 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 182 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 204 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 194 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 193 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 171 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 145 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 149 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 101 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 103 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 94 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 103 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 94 | #626 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 64 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 56 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 44 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 41 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 19 | #1,569 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 23 | #1,440 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 34 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 38 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 36 | #1,132 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 30 | #1,268 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 42 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 32 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 31 | #1,314 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 32 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 25 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 26 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,869 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 27 | #1,448 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 32 | #1,298 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 30 | #1,378 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 22 | #1,668 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 25 | #1,469 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 30 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 22 | #1,564 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 26 | #1,357 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 16 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 15 | #1,649 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 13 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 9 | #1,823 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,882 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 6 | #1,378 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,114 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lamont reached #214 in 1972. As a girl name, it reached #3,176 in 1973. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lamont
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.