Is Dina a boy or girl name?
Dina is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 171 girls and 0 boys were named Dina, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 31,929 US babies named Dina were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,334
- Babies named Dina since 1883
- 31,929
- Most popular year
- 1969
- 1,580 babies
Boys and girls named Dina, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 71 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 100 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 315 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 396 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 366 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 687 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,689 | 100% |
| 1960s | 30 | 10,215 | 99.7% |
| 1970s | 21 | 8,047 | 99.7% |
| 1980s | 20 | 3,320 | 99.4% |
| 1990s | 5 | 2,222 | 99.8% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,796 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,674 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 924 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 171 | #1,334 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 210 | #1,155 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 204 | #1,178 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 179 | #1,284 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 160 | #1,363 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,270 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 161 | #1,394 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 176 | #1,323 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 159 | #1,447 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,456 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,511 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 159 | #1,427 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 190 | #1,266 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 173 | #1,340 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,372 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,336 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,397 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,495 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 162 | #1,399 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 191 | #1,201 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,151 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,151 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,175 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,119 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,091 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 198 | #1,030 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 200 | #998 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 200 | #977 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 209 | #931 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 192 | #979 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 224 | #874 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 226 | #857 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 246 | #815 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 251 | #820 |
| 1990 | 5 | #8,468 | 276 | #752 |
| 1989 | 7 | #6,400 | 270 | #730 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 302 | #648 |
| 1987 | 6 | #6,325 | 313 | #617 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 287 | #644 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 283 | #649 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 349 | #545 |
| 1983 | 7 | #5,064 | 319 | #568 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 363 | #536 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 412 | #496 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 422 | #490 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 420 | #486 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 461 | #434 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 470 | #434 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 553 | #374 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 620 | #349 |
| 1974 | 5 | #5,429 | 809 | #295 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 906 | #274 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 1,097 | #248 |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,539 | 1,165 | #254 |
| 1970 | 10 | #3,122 | 1,546 | #207 |
| 1969 | 9 | #3,125 | 1,571 | #199 |
| 1968 | 8 | #3,177 | 1,247 | #231 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 1,256 | #233 |
| 1966 | 7 | #3,313 | 1,048 | #261 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 831 | #311 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 949 | #299 |
| 1963 | 6 | #3,738 | 994 | #295 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 1,031 | #280 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 734 | #352 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 554 | #410 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 323 | #542 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 245 | #626 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 235 | #642 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 206 | #669 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 132 | #844 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 132 | #817 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 102 | #935 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 101 | #921 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 103 | #892 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 110 | #835 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,123 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 103 | #861 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 82 | #975 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 88 | #886 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 68 | #917 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 65 | #965 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,024 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,038 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,035 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,039 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,480 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,235 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 52 | #967 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,068 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,227 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,051 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,315 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,394 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,292 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,165 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,179 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,346 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,390 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,246 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,123 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,191 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,357 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,013 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,379 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,288 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,180 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,077 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,116 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,132 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,080 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,127 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,101 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,185 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 22 | #937 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,229 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,392 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,152 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,417 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,350 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,330 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,524 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,231 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,152 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 13 | #930 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,183 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,058 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,614 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,147 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,333 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,393 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,109 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,198 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 9 | #955 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #955 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,061 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 10 | #743 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #950 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #710 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Dina reached #3,122 in 1970. As a girl name, it reached #199 in 1969. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Dina
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.