Is Ronda a boy or girl name?
Ronda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99% of the 34,675 US babies named Ronda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ronda since 1915
- 34,675
- Most popular year
- 1965
- 1,922 babies
Boys and girls named Ronda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 17 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 32 | 73 | 69.5% |
| 1930s | 34 | 277 | 89.1% |
| 1940s | 89 | 1,741 | 95.1% |
| 1950s | 64 | 6,854 | 99.1% |
| 1960s | 73 | 16,281 | 99.6% |
| 1970s | 44 | 6,930 | 99.4% |
| 1980s | 6 | 1,589 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 0 | 422 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 37 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 7 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,303 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,821 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,855 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,044 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,748 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,215 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,000 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,615 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 7 | #15,076 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 7 | #15,152 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,169 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,157 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,386 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,720 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,568 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,895 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,607 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,310 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,487 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,706 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,345 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,027 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,208 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,374 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,991 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,553 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,765 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,488 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,347 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,127 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,198 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 164 | #912 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 179 | #856 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 219 | #758 |
| 1981 | 6 | #6,096 | 227 | #730 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 282 | #647 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 306 | #590 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 326 | #545 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 410 | #474 |
| 1976 | 7 | #4,827 | 496 | #407 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 589 | #359 |
| 1974 | 7 | #4,545 | 613 | #353 |
| 1973 | 5 | #5,736 | 719 | #319 |
| 1972 | 10 | #3,295 | 939 | #276 |
| 1971 | 8 | #3,894 | 1,177 | #251 |
| 1970 | 7 | #4,161 | 1,355 | #233 |
| 1969 | 11 | #2,832 | 1,456 | #214 |
| 1968 | 6 | #4,053 | 1,557 | #200 |
| 1967 | 9 | #2,947 | 1,794 | #179 |
| 1966 | 6 | #3,870 | 1,753 | #187 |
| 1965 | 9 | #2,947 | 1,913 | #181 |
| 1964 | 10 | #2,810 | 1,715 | #207 |
| 1963 | 8 | #3,275 | 1,650 | #210 |
| 1962 | 8 | #3,257 | 1,596 | #213 |
| 1961 | 6 | #3,992 | 1,485 | #223 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 1,362 | #234 |
| 1959 | 6 | #3,918 | 1,134 | #259 |
| 1958 | 6 | #3,862 | 988 | #283 |
| 1957 | 7 | #3,504 | 1,005 | #277 |
| 1956 | 11 | #2,612 | 837 | #307 |
| 1955 | 10 | #2,720 | 697 | #324 |
| 1954 | 5 | #4,277 | 577 | #360 |
| 1953 | 5 | #4,256 | 490 | #385 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 432 | #401 |
| 1951 | 14 | #2,124 | 377 | #429 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 317 | #454 |
| 1949 | 5 | #4,115 | 270 | #491 |
| 1948 | 5 | #4,091 | 247 | #527 |
| 1947 | 16 | #1,976 | 253 | #526 |
| 1946 | 17 | #1,802 | 201 | #561 |
| 1945 | 8 | #2,718 | 179 | #549 |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,065 | 130 | #650 |
| 1943 | 7 | #3,187 | 142 | #638 |
| 1942 | 9 | #2,682 | 98 | #765 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,922 | 116 | #660 |
| 1940 | 10 | #2,450 | 105 | #679 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 71 | #823 |
| 1938 | 6 | #3,471 | 58 | #943 |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,864 | 46 | #1,061 |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,811 | 23 | #1,586 |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,204 | 14 | #2,285 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,073 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,962 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,469 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,289 |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,458 | 5 | #5,131 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,445 | 8 | #3,636 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,121 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,019 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,506 |
| 1925 | 10 | #2,899 | 14 | #2,598 |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,795 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,907 |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,841 | 8 | #3,950 |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,862 | 8 | #3,963 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 6 | #4,086 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,467 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 6 | #3,756 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ronda reached #1,802 in 1946. As a girl name, it reached #179 in 1967. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ronda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.