Is Dixon a boy or girl name?
Dixon is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 49 boys were named Dixon, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 3,045 US babies named Dixon were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,671
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Dixon since 1881
- 3,045
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 80 babies
Boys and girls named Dixon, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 130 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 222 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 208 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 269 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 288 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 188 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 128 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 259 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 344 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 623 | 5 | 0.8% |
| 2020s | 227 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49 | #2,671 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 43 | #2,906 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 40 | #3,066 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 30 | #3,667 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 65 | #2,146 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 54 | #2,467 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 58 | #2,310 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 60 | #2,221 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 75 | #1,943 | 5 | #16,941 |
| 2015 | 70 | #2,039 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 75 | #1,928 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 62 | #2,145 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 54 | #2,364 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 59 | #2,210 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 56 | #2,292 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 50 | #2,538 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 37 | #3,122 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 35 | #3,203 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 33 | #3,241 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 38 | #2,812 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 34 | #2,962 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 35 | #2,801 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 25 | #3,478 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 22 | #3,749 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 35 | #2,638 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 33 | #2,627 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 28 | #2,879 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 25 | #3,010 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 38 | #2,193 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 27 | #2,705 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 24 | #2,969 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 25 | #2,802 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 25 | #2,760 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 20 | #3,143 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 14 | #4,031 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 25 | #2,559 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,106 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,383 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 16 | #3,035 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,422 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 8 | #4,663 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 20 | #2,433 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 9 | #4,324 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 12 | #3,470 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 18 | #2,641 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 16 | #2,806 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 14 | #2,946 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 11 | #3,323 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 14 | #2,792 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #2,995 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 17 | #2,338 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 16 | #2,351 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 16 | #2,395 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 12 | #2,772 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 16 | #2,160 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 21 | #1,745 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 13 | #2,270 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 16 | #1,984 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,876 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 17 | #1,993 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 15 | #2,135 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,821 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 24 | #1,655 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 28 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 25 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 29 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 33 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 30 | #1,403 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 27 | #1,473 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 38 | #1,216 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 22 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 37 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 25 | #1,476 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 19 | #1,717 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 33 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 32 | #1,302 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 28 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 17 | #1,643 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 28 | #1,261 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 29 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 32 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 20 | #1,547 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 31 | #1,214 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 21 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 27 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 23 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 26 | #1,302 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 20 | #1,555 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 18 | #1,676 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 17 | #1,724 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 23 | #1,464 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 15 | #1,992 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 18 | #1,810 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 24 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 20 | #1,759 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 19 | #1,809 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 23 | #1,597 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 24 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 28 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 23 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 18 | #1,925 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 25 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 12 | #2,407 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 28 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 13 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 14 | #2,071 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 21 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 18 | #1,453 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,135 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,348 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,807 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #807 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Dixon reached #807 in 1881. As a girl name, it reached #16,941 in 2016. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.