Is Duke a boy or girl name?
Duke is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 375 boys were named Duke, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 11,200 US babies named Duke were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #709
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Duke since 1880
- 11,200
- Most popular year
- 2018
- 529 babies
Boys and girls named Duke, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 67 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 71 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 362 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 344 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 429 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 780 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 796 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 553 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 450 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 567 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 756 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 3,698 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,016 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 375 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 395 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 403 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 419 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 424 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 521 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 529 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 523 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 515 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 455 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 384 | #669 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 323 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 160 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 147 | #1,201 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 141 | #1,247 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 89 | #1,733 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 104 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 96 | #1,615 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 89 | #1,621 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 75 | #1,759 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 62 | #1,959 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 74 | #1,678 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 59 | #1,900 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 53 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 55 | #1,900 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 54 | #1,833 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 49 | #1,967 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 59 | #1,676 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 44 | #1,995 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 55 | #1,655 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 63 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 75 | #1,315 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 65 | #1,420 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 43 | #1,842 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 60 | #1,458 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 50 | #1,593 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 63 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 56 | #1,320 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 33 | #1,849 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 37 | #1,681 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 36 | #1,638 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 44 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 43 | #1,467 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 41 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 47 | #1,384 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 70 | #1,062 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 36 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 36 | #1,549 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 43 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 44 | #1,308 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 52 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 62 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 57 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 75 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 78 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 76 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 62 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 73 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 84 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 70 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 89 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 100 | #765 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 76 | #874 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 70 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 96 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 107 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 89 | #790 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 108 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 105 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 85 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 75 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 53 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 49 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 49 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 60 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 38 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 59 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 47 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 43 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 35 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 28 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 46 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 42 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 46 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 45 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 41 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 46 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 46 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 38 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 22 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 28 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 31 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 19 | #1,666 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 40 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 33 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 22 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 40 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 45 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 43 | #1,071 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 45 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 35 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 27 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 41 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 31 | #1,335 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 33 | #1,259 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 41 | #1,067 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 39 | #1,099 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 40 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 37 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 35 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 17 | #1,507 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 19 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 20 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 15 | #868 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 13 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 13 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,130 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 7 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 11 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 8 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 9 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 9 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,141 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 7 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 6 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 7 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 8 | #765 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 5 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 7 | #765 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Duke reached #533 in 2018. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.