Is Kimber a boy or girl name?
Kimber is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 290 girls and 9 boys were named Kimber, so 97% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 96.2% of the 11,370 US babies named Kimber were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #8,654
- Girl rank, 2024
- #911
- Babies named Kimber since 1914
- 11,370
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 523 babies
Boys and girls named Kimber, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 22 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 42 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 121 | 332 | 73.3% |
| 1960s | 76 | 752 | 90.8% |
| 1970s | 29 | 477 | 94.3% |
| 1980s | 0 | 990 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,163 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,179 | 100% |
| 2010s | 72 | 4,239 | 98.3% |
| 2020s | 55 | 1,802 | 97% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 | #8,654 | 290 | #911 |
| 2023 | 9 | #8,612 | 304 | #884 |
| 2022 | 10 | #8,063 | 367 | #776 |
| 2021 | 13 | #6,525 | 426 | #681 |
| 2020 | 14 | #6,154 | 415 | #684 |
| 2019 | 9 | #8,572 | 508 | #599 |
| 2018 | 14 | #6,187 | 508 | #600 |
| 2017 | 12 | #6,924 | 501 | #603 |
| 2016 | 8 | #9,322 | 515 | #593 |
| 2015 | 11 | #7,332 | 453 | #631 |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,323 | 456 | #627 |
| 2013 | 7 | #10,250 | 430 | #665 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 344 | #791 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 261 | #982 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 263 | #971 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 245 | #1,054 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 185 | #1,333 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 196 | #1,259 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 161 | #1,408 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,900 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,278 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,072 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,658 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,526 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,099 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,239 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,175 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,859 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,832 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,499 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 152 | #1,169 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 123 | #1,348 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,271 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,088 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 188 | #985 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 180 | #969 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 240 | #786 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,078 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,453 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,543 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,713 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,872 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,199 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,175 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,138 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,410 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,949 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,356 |
| 1976 | 5 | #6,065 | 43 | #2,037 |
| 1975 | 7 | #4,569 | 31 | #2,540 |
| 1974 | 6 | #4,960 | 41 | #2,042 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,814 |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,388 | 67 | #1,450 |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,684 | 58 | #1,618 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,551 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,445 |
| 1968 | 6 | #3,930 | 70 | #1,332 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,342 |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,262 | 63 | #1,393 |
| 1965 | 13 | #2,322 | 85 | #1,162 |
| 1964 | 11 | #2,604 | 98 | #1,108 |
| 1963 | 14 | #2,260 | 73 | #1,295 |
| 1962 | 10 | #2,762 | 79 | #1,241 |
| 1961 | 8 | #3,236 | 76 | #1,276 |
| 1960 | 9 | #2,976 | 75 | #1,273 |
| 1959 | 9 | #2,942 | 74 | #1,251 |
| 1958 | 14 | #2,220 | 58 | #1,401 |
| 1957 | 11 | #2,567 | 59 | #1,382 |
| 1956 | 10 | #2,716 | 52 | #1,475 |
| 1955 | 16 | #2,008 | 29 | #2,001 |
| 1954 | 17 | #1,928 | 21 | #2,409 |
| 1953 | 13 | #2,238 | 17 | #2,643 |
| 1952 | 12 | #2,326 | 16 | #2,731 |
| 1951 | 8 | #2,955 | 6 | #5,142 |
| 1950 | 11 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 8 | #2,910 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 8 | #2,907 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 7 | #3,233 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,782 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 9 | #2,654 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,776 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 5 | #4,065 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,564 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,112 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,962 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 6 | #3,946 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,226 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,521 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Kimber reached #1,928 in 1954. As a girl name, it reached #593 in 2016. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Kimber
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.