Is Edmond a boy or girl name?
Edmond is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 63 boys were named Edmond, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 24,827 US babies named Edmond were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,262
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Edmond since 1880
- 24,827
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 433 babies
Boys and girls named Edmond, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 429 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 469 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 558 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 2,727 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 3,842 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 2,941 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 3,040 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 3,112 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 2,144 | 7 | 0.3% |
| 1970s | 1,550 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,225 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 927 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 798 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 729 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 329 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63 | #2,262 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 58 | #2,368 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 78 | #1,972 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 68 | #2,114 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 62 | #2,216 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 75 | #1,960 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 76 | #1,944 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 62 | #2,172 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 69 | #2,050 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 76 | #1,917 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 80 | #1,846 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 76 | #1,870 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 83 | #1,787 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 61 | #2,154 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 71 | #1,963 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 75 | #1,914 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 65 | #2,107 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 102 | #1,541 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 77 | #1,794 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 68 | #1,873 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 84 | #1,569 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 76 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 82 | #1,519 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 79 | #1,529 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 90 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 67 | #1,613 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 97 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 85 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 68 | #1,484 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 106 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 100 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 103 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 110 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 98 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 93 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 110 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 126 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 106 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 93 | #948 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 116 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 122 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 106 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 143 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 145 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 158 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 200 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 195 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 165 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 124 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 134 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 114 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 138 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 128 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 163 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 189 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 185 | #576 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 182 | #562 | 7 | #5,801 |
| 1967 | 181 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 179 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 208 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 209 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 255 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 233 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 243 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 269 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 265 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 265 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 324 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 321 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 335 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 306 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 337 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 296 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 346 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 317 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 293 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 366 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 354 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 314 | #367 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 269 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 271 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 322 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 296 | #354 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 282 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 273 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 281 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 260 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 264 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 312 | #302 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 278 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 287 | #320 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 289 | #317 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 294 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 316 | #307 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 360 | #301 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 319 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 406 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 377 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 376 | #292 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 400 | #286 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 402 | #287 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 343 | #307 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 388 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 398 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 433 | #266 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 396 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 427 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 358 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 365 | #259 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 323 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 269 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 200 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 200 | #250 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 91 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 98 | #241 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 68 | #270 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 88 | #219 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 68 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 52 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 48 | #288 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 53 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 44 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 49 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 41 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 47 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 41 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 42 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 47 | #256 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 58 | #239 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 50 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 50 | #244 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 50 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 40 | #289 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 40 | #252 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 51 | #234 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 44 | #244 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 43 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 36 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 50 | #237 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 36 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 43 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 52 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 39 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 42 | #239 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 44 | #251 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Edmond reached #210 in 1883. As a girl name, it reached #5,801 in 1968. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.