Is Rhoda a boy or girl name?
Rhoda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 58 girls and 0 boys were named Rhoda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 26,021 US babies named Rhoda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,870
- Babies named Rhoda since 1880
- 26,021
- Most popular year
- 1926
- 547 babies
Boys and girls named Rhoda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1,024 | 100% |
| 1890s | 7 | 1,356 | 99.5% |
| 1900s | 0 | 1,325 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 2,943 | 100% |
| 1920s | 5 | 4,756 | 99.9% |
| 1930s | 0 | 4,036 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 2,819 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 2,615 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,925 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,215 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 510 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 416 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 379 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 430 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 260 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,870 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,369 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,204 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,955 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,381 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,437 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,384 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,611 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,175 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,380 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,766 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,988 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,466 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,550 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,296 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,352 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,767 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,547 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,143 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,931 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,381 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,020 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,712 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,476 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,323 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,140 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,059 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,583 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,079 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,344 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,685 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,207 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,128 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,262 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,510 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,707 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,963 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,016 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,046 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,164 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,953 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,122 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,915 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,692 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,567 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,540 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,449 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,272 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,069 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 182 | #777 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 162 | #826 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 132 | #930 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 128 | #956 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 129 | #982 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,050 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 132 | #925 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 143 | #857 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 161 | #785 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 234 | #622 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 225 | #657 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 221 | #694 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 189 | #750 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 181 | #773 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 212 | #713 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 227 | #676 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 259 | #620 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 264 | #613 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 356 | #505 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 241 | #616 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 239 | #598 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 233 | #593 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 253 | #550 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 230 | #569 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 262 | #513 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 278 | #485 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 271 | #489 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 251 | #523 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 287 | #485 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 271 | #479 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 227 | #478 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 276 | #433 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 306 | #420 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 331 | #392 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 284 | #406 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 315 | #371 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 348 | #341 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 360 | #334 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 341 | #344 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 376 | #313 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 405 | #306 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 425 | #304 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 378 | #321 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 420 | #308 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 486 | #283 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 497 | #297 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 483 | #300 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 504 | #297 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,684 | 455 | #314 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 547 | #282 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 514 | #297 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 503 | #298 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 436 | #309 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 463 | #297 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 430 | #313 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 421 | #318 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 420 | #308 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 433 | #306 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 345 | #335 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 385 | #308 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 385 | #297 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 266 | #324 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 189 | #350 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 189 | #330 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 161 | #311 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 170 | #296 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 136 | #314 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 108 | #341 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 138 | #299 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 132 | #291 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 145 | #275 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 116 | #301 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 122 | #287 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 152 | #255 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 125 | #260 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 151 | #266 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 127 | #250 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 148 | #243 |
| 1897 | 7 | #919 | 127 | #253 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 130 | #249 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 136 | #237 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 136 | #230 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 136 | #224 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 140 | #220 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 138 | #198 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 138 | #202 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 148 | #187 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 130 | #196 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 104 | #199 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 114 | #189 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 106 | #181 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 93 | #192 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 93 | #173 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 79 | #178 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 84 | #161 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 73 | #176 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rhoda reached #919 in 1897. As a girl name, it reached #161 in 1881. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rhoda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.