Is Imogene a boy or girl name?
Imogene is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 73 girls and 0 boys were named Imogene, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 27,886 US babies named Imogene were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,464
- Babies named Imogene since 1880
- 27,886
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 1,494 babies
Boys and girls named Imogene, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 136 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 294 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 597 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 3,690 | 100% |
| 1920s | 15 | 11,295 | 99.9% |
| 1930s | 35 | 6,931 | 99.5% |
| 1940s | 5 | 2,450 | 99.8% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,101 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 353 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 113 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 58 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 44 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 87 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 352 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 330 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,464 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,911 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,497 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,731 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,640 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,765 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,528 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,265 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,432 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,339 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,741 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,380 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,019 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,819 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,442 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,614 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,051 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 9 | #12,001 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,891 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,410 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,041 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,547 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,263 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,983 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,964 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,597 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,668 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,335 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,946 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,322 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,857 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,791 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,116 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,489 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,141 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,874 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,654 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,635 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,514 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,463 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,401 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,689 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,037 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,345 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,962 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,101 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,289 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,810 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,202 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,594 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,869 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,089 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,961 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,613 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,626 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,600 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,180 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,837 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,585 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,396 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,268 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,270 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,098 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,108 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 107 | #959 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 119 | #879 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 113 | #890 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 148 | #729 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 143 | #731 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 151 | #700 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 150 | #686 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 172 | #633 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 206 | #593 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 219 | #533 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 224 | #483 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 234 | #470 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 273 | #451 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 272 | #443 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,746 | 340 | #362 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 360 | #336 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 408 | #308 |
| 1938 | 6 | #3,335 | 447 | #297 |
| 1937 | 7 | #3,036 | 491 | #281 |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,789 | 543 | #261 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 614 | #253 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 768 | #226 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,137 | 788 | #215 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 941 | #196 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 907 | #201 |
| 1930 | 10 | #2,684 | 1,024 | #188 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 1,179 | #174 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 1,314 | #163 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 1,494 | #157 |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,937 | 1,253 | #172 |
| 1925 | 9 | #3,024 | 1,248 | #174 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 1,247 | #182 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 1,001 | #200 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 916 | #213 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 839 | #223 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 804 | #229 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 702 | #241 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 590 | #258 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 564 | #262 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 423 | #290 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 444 | #280 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 333 | #289 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 227 | #317 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 172 | #349 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 137 | #338 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 98 | #398 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 107 | #350 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 88 | #386 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 64 | #449 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 53 | #467 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 53 | #466 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 48 | #476 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 54 | #432 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 42 | #488 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 29 | #581 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 59 | #434 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 32 | #531 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 27 | #627 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 40 | #465 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 34 | #509 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 34 | #505 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 25 | #587 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 26 | #555 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 31 | #490 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 23 | #550 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 22 | #565 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 26 | #490 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 22 | #537 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 17 | #543 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 12 | #677 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 7 | #872 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 14 | #530 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 12 | #547 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 14 | #457 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 12 | #505 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Imogene reached #2,684 in 1930. As a girl name, it reached #157 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Imogene
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.