Is Leola a boy or girl name?
Leola is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 19 girls and 0 boys were named Leola, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 28,164 US babies named Leola were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,272
- Babies named Leola since 1880
- 28,164
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 855 babies
Boys and girls named Leola, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 531 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 1,255 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 2,615 | 100% |
| 1910s | 5 | 6,143 | 99.9% |
| 1920s | 30 | 7,067 | 99.6% |
| 1930s | 17 | 4,217 | 99.6% |
| 1940s | 0 | 2,694 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,740 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 730 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 372 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 224 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 116 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 183 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 120 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,272 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,320 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,008 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,559 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,584 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,609 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,680 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,268 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,821 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,137 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,334 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,596 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,052 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,026 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,554 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,186 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,601 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,349 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,021 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,496 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,365 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,823 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,596 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,382 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,656 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,499 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,370 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,817 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,467 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,241 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,873 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,814 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,128 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,608 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,448 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,969 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,588 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,867 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,758 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,089 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,826 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,486 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,390 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,566 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,495 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,603 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,148 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,121 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,488 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,046 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,792 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,426 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,889 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,645 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,697 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,765 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,673 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,439 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,536 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,261 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,274 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,071 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,093 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 120 | #979 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 113 | #994 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 129 | #902 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 150 | #828 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 152 | #807 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 159 | #751 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 182 | #695 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 194 | #642 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 190 | #646 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 228 | #562 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 243 | #533 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 237 | #542 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 218 | #564 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 236 | #553 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 241 | #504 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 267 | #438 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 267 | #440 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 287 | #436 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 300 | #412 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 318 | #385 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 323 | #365 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 363 | #330 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 379 | #321 |
| 1937 | 5 | #3,822 | 350 | #335 |
| 1936 | 7 | #3,040 | 396 | #302 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 424 | #294 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 414 | #308 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 406 | #306 |
| 1932 | 5 | #4,068 | 488 | #281 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 467 | #287 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 530 | #283 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 583 | #266 |
| 1928 | 7 | #3,563 | 589 | #266 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,531 | 638 | #262 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 644 | #263 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 757 | #240 |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,695 | 757 | #242 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 683 | #248 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 778 | #232 |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,694 | 789 | #230 |
| 1920 | 6 | #4,076 | 849 | #226 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 830 | #216 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 777 | #227 |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,313 | 708 | #232 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 780 | #218 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 669 | #233 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 567 | #222 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 512 | #205 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 514 | #190 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 363 | #197 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 423 | #166 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 326 | #182 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 321 | #179 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 310 | #180 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 273 | #182 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 319 | #166 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 244 | #192 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 204 | #207 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 207 | #204 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 176 | #217 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 235 | #204 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 151 | #221 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 169 | #226 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 121 | #258 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 141 | #233 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 135 | #238 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 128 | #235 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 107 | #258 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 122 | #242 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 89 | #259 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 92 | #261 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 102 | #232 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 72 | #274 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 38 | #351 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 49 | #294 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 53 | #274 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 59 | #255 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 51 | #255 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 47 | #254 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 36 | #271 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 24 | #331 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Leola reached #3,040 in 1936. As a girl name, it reached #166 in 1905. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Leola
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.