Is Elbert a boy or girl name?
Elbert is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 11 boys were named Elbert, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 33,598 US babies named Elbert were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,357
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Elbert since 1880
- 33,598
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 793 babies
Boys and girls named Elbert, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 905 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 910 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 1,131 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 4,990 | 6 | 0.1% |
| 1920s | 7,076 | 37 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 5,217 | 15 | 0.3% |
| 1940s | 4,450 | 15 | 0.3% |
| 1950s | 3,507 | 18 | 0.5% |
| 1960s | 2,246 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,338 | 6 | 0.4% |
| 1980s | 791 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 491 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 259 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 157 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 33 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | #7,357 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 10 | #7,923 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 5 | #12,666 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 7 | #9,855 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 11 | #7,295 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 14 | #6,124 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,873 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 21 | #4,663 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 15 | #5,809 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 14 | #6,085 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 13 | #6,351 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 15 | #5,790 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,044 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 21 | #4,563 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 16 | #5,632 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 22 | #4,439 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 28 | #3,720 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 21 | #4,396 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 30 | #3,338 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 25 | #3,669 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 23 | #3,761 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 23 | #3,704 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 34 | #2,756 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 37 | #2,544 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 30 | #2,817 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 28 | #2,881 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 40 | #2,181 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 42 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 48 | #1,816 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 43 | #1,939 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 47 | #1,801 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 69 | #1,362 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 68 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 76 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 84 | #1,156 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 76 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 76 | #1,102 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 59 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 81 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 74 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 66 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 90 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 99 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 86 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 97 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 113 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 104 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 104 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 126 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 131 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 158 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 146 | #665 | 6 | #7,541 |
| 1971 | 198 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 161 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 176 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 185 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 189 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 202 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 235 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 241 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 273 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 226 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 256 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 263 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 340 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 347 | #422 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 356 | #412 | 5 | #6,334 |
| 1956 | 314 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 345 | #388 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 348 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 354 | #365 | 7 | #4,708 |
| 1952 | 362 | #357 | 6 | #5,083 |
| 1951 | 397 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 344 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 417 | #333 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 386 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 455 | #322 | 6 | #4,906 |
| 1946 | 418 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 416 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 414 | #292 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 498 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 471 | #278 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 505 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 470 | #253 | 9 | #3,027 |
| 1939 | 460 | #250 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 473 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 475 | #245 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 491 | #231 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 547 | #217 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 527 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 537 | #214 | 5 | #4,390 |
| 1932 | 532 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 566 | #220 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 609 | #213 | 10 | #2,904 |
| 1929 | 601 | #212 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 656 | #207 | 7 | #3,870 |
| 1927 | 677 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 717 | #196 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 673 | #208 | 9 | #3,450 |
| 1924 | 726 | #195 | 8 | #3,753 |
| 1923 | 772 | #183 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 754 | #184 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 714 | #193 | 6 | #4,630 |
| 1920 | 786 | #181 | 7 | #4,090 |
| 1919 | 735 | #179 | 6 | #4,408 |
| 1918 | 663 | #191 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 675 | #179 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 662 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 669 | #169 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 450 | #188 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 416 | #168 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 342 | #172 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 195 | #169 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 183 | #166 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 167 | #151 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 121 | #178 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 120 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 85 | #207 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 132 | #155 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 100 | #182 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 95 | #172 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 108 | #163 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 78 | #187 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 125 | #169 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 81 | #177 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 87 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 95 | #164 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 96 | #166 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 106 | #145 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 97 | #159 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 89 | #162 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 93 | #171 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 77 | #166 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 89 | #159 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 95 | #152 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 98 | #155 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 82 | #151 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 94 | #149 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 92 | #146 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 90 | #152 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 92 | #134 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 99 | #140 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 84 | #148 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 79 | #166 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elbert reached #134 in 1883. As a girl name, it reached #2,904 in 1930. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Elbert
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.