Is Reba a boy or girl name?
Reba is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 20 girls and 0 boys were named Reba, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 35,481 US babies named Reba were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,091
- Babies named Reba since 1880
- 35,481
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 792 babies
Boys and girls named Reba, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 224 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 841 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 1,493 | 100% |
| 1910s | 12 | 5,082 | 99.8% |
| 1920s | 31 | 7,312 | 99.6% |
| 1930s | 17 | 6,188 | 99.7% |
| 1940s | 0 | 4,847 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 4,139 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,174 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 737 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 658 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,138 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 293 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 187 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 108 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,091 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,514 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,137 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,118 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,274 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,136 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,745 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,481 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,763 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,342 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,650 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,102 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,537 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,296 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,153 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,673 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,514 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,863 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,776 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,806 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,363 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,394 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,865 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,921 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,644 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,891 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,523 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,152 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,501 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,336 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,189 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 157 | #1,135 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,074 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,142 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,452 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,493 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,326 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,346 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,503 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,125 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,136 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,185 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,357 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,219 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,580 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,074 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,818 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,752 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,562 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,867 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,514 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,250 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,275 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,110 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,022 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,030 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 116 | #964 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 164 | #768 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 166 | #762 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 199 | #699 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 218 | #702 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 240 | #653 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 268 | #613 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 308 | #572 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 382 | #495 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 350 | #519 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 365 | #502 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 403 | #472 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 452 | #431 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 444 | #420 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 453 | #407 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 440 | #407 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 429 | #403 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 441 | #389 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 362 | #422 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 432 | #377 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 440 | #378 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 488 | #364 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 475 | #347 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 442 | #325 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 440 | #324 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 529 | #303 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 526 | #300 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 525 | #281 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 550 | #264 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,865 | 538 | #267 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 574 | #264 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 601 | #256 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 609 | #251 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 614 | #254 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 636 | #245 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 627 | #242 |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,696 | 657 | #240 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 652 | #233 |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,918 | 680 | #235 |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,868 | 642 | #247 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 729 | #231 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 726 | #241 |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,322 | 747 | #235 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 792 | #232 |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,783 | 773 | #236 |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,756 | 728 | #242 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 728 | #241 |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,841 | 748 | #241 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 699 | #248 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 706 | #239 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 689 | #245 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 618 | #250 |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,445 | 665 | #241 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 662 | #234 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 502 | #238 |
| 1913 | 5 | #3,175 | 410 | #240 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 335 | #245 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 259 | #243 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 236 | #251 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 208 | #246 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 183 | #261 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 167 | #267 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 150 | #273 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 162 | #256 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 128 | #279 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 126 | #280 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 129 | #277 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 124 | #262 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 116 | #305 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 93 | #310 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 133 | #262 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 82 | #325 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 109 | #274 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 87 | #313 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 100 | #278 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 65 | #335 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 71 | #322 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 58 | #335 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 43 | #383 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 39 | #392 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 33 | #437 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 29 | #410 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 28 | #412 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 22 | #455 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 19 | #475 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 15 | #513 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 9 | #668 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 17 | #415 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 13 | #488 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Reba reached #3,175 in 1913. As a girl name, it reached #231 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Reba
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.