Is Bettie a boy or girl name?
Bettie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 12 girls and 0 boys were named Bettie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 38,468 US babies named Bettie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #8,505
- Babies named Bettie since 1880
- 38,468
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 1,233 babies
Boys and girls named Bettie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1,298 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 1,357 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 1,363 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 3,245 | 100% |
| 1920s | 27 | 10,335 | 99.7% |
| 1930s | 41 | 8,936 | 99.5% |
| 1940s | 10 | 6,877 | 99.9% |
| 1950s | 5 | 3,176 | 99.8% |
| 1960s | 0 | 969 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 322 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 175 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 82 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 88 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 55 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,505 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,556 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,792 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,064 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,664 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,848 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,699 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,109 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,032 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,038 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,657 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,277 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,160 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,792 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,977 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,596 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,640 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,715 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,002 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,453 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,286 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,228 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,875 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,595 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,366 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,925 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,230 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,966 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,705 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,556 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,486 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,360 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,535 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,701 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,303 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,211 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,647 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,986 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,349 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,364 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,363 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,517 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,154 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,935 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,913 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,420 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,688 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,560 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,176 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,312 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,711 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,721 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,441 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,418 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,400 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,313 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,242 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,104 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,082 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 118 | #987 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 145 | #896 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 174 | #775 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,047 | 230 | #660 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 204 | #694 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 272 | #586 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 246 | #611 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 279 | #548 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 321 | #495 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 326 | #476 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 371 | #445 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 490 | #363 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 437 | #387 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 538 | #336 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 616 | #308 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 649 | #307 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 679 | #281 |
| 1945 | 5 | #3,378 | 691 | #255 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 719 | #251 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 782 | #245 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 724 | #256 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,552 | 732 | #235 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 747 | #225 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,529 | 776 | #214 |
| 1938 | 9 | #2,498 | 869 | #201 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 762 | #218 |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,181 | 825 | #203 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 831 | #205 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 916 | #196 |
| 1933 | 11 | #2,225 | 921 | #185 |
| 1932 | 5 | #3,833 | 999 | #183 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 1,032 | #177 |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,051 | 1,005 | #191 |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,597 | 1,029 | #190 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 1,098 | #186 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,262 | 1,072 | #190 |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,747 | 1,183 | #178 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 1,204 | #181 |
| 1924 | 5 | #4,416 | 1,228 | #183 |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,305 | 1,058 | #197 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 868 | #219 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 818 | #228 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 777 | #232 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 608 | #259 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 522 | #273 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 447 | #291 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 339 | #332 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 347 | #317 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 256 | #328 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 216 | #325 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 191 | #327 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 153 | #316 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 166 | #300 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 137 | #312 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 130 | #311 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 157 | #278 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 110 | #317 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 128 | #294 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 155 | #252 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 123 | #282 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 145 | #259 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 111 | #281 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 167 | #250 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 135 | #239 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 150 | #240 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 138 | #239 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 125 | #255 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 133 | #239 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 118 | #250 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 129 | #230 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 155 | #202 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 138 | #194 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 136 | #204 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 144 | #188 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 169 | #172 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 117 | #183 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 141 | #164 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 127 | #162 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 118 | #164 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 130 | #145 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 136 | #131 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 103 | #148 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 113 | #138 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Bettie reached #2,225 in 1933. As a girl name, it reached #131 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Bettie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.