Is Rebeca a boy or girl name?
Rebeca is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 183 girls and 0 boys were named Rebeca, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 14,030 US babies named Rebeca were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,269
- Babies named Rebeca since 1888
- 14,030
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 422 babies
Boys and girls named Rebeca, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 84 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 249 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 213 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 204 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 392 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 717 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,298 | 100% |
| 1980s | 5 | 1,798 | 99.7% |
| 1990s | 0 | 3,105 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,121 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,941 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 873 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,269 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 177 | #1,294 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 184 | #1,291 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,471 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,245 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,343 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 176 | #1,296 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,385 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 216 | #1,168 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 179 | #1,326 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,274 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 208 | #1,159 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 216 | #1,146 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 219 | #1,120 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 201 | #1,205 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 282 | #947 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 256 | #1,026 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 284 | #958 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 315 | #853 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 326 | #797 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 359 | #736 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 422 | #634 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 261 | #876 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 288 | #815 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 328 | #709 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 320 | #712 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 313 | #709 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 288 | #743 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 295 | #716 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 311 | #684 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 340 | #641 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 340 | #656 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 302 | #711 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 307 | #695 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 289 | #724 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 239 | #799 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 232 | #799 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 164 | #968 |
| 1986 | 5 | #7,578 | 153 | #1,010 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 172 | #923 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,043 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 165 | #912 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 172 | #890 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 195 | #817 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 170 | #896 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 159 | #928 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 151 | #938 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 136 | #998 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 146 | #907 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,011 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 125 | #982 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 128 | #946 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 124 | #976 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,052 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,206 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,181 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,289 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,296 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,237 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,364 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,391 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,249 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,381 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,447 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,310 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,473 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,651 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,639 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,712 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,662 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,729 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,638 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,770 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,461 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,901 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,119 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,060 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,034 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,213 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,043 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,082 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,230 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,749 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,791 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,946 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,625 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,551 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,892 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,733 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,986 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,898 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,650 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,375 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,415 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,342 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,303 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,219 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,763 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,658 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,691 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,755 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,010 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,885 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,181 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,561 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,843 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,645 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,405 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,626 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,823 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,299 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,101 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,522 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,174 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,822 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,501 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,441 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rebeca reached #7,578 in 1986. As a girl name, it reached #634 in 2003. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rebeca
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.