Is Lilia a boy or girl name?
Lilia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 288 girls and 0 boys were named Lilia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 14,000 US babies named Lilia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #920
- Babies named Lilia since 1884
- 14,000
- Most popular year
- 2007
- 308 babies
Boys and girls named Lilia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 36 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 115 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 238 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 590 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 483 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 352 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 712 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 923 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,353 | 100% |
| 1980s | 5 | 1,181 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,485 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,492 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,733 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,272 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 288 | #920 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 271 | #960 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 260 | #1,006 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 248 | #1,025 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 205 | #1,153 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 223 | #1,101 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 245 | #1,050 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 233 | #1,090 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 268 | #989 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 283 | #959 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 291 | #927 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 280 | #914 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 302 | #882 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 304 | #862 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 304 | #874 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 298 | #909 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 293 | #931 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 308 | #898 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 281 | #934 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 228 | #1,048 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 256 | #940 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 224 | #1,027 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 217 | #1,009 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 193 | #1,099 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 194 | #1,069 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,102 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,140 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 190 | #1,013 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,206 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,303 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,291 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 119 | #1,380 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,259 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,238 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 144 | #1,192 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,191 |
| 1988 | 5 | #8,030 | 105 | #1,362 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,386 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,246 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,343 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,275 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,134 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 134 | #1,072 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 144 | #1,012 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,039 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,000 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,157 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,002 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 134 | #955 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 154 | #869 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 158 | #837 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 146 | #879 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,026 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 131 | #972 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 128 | #983 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,100 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,036 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,128 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,227 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,125 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,092 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,122 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,189 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,104 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,171 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,122 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,147 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,104 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,283 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,177 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,146 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,160 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,273 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,185 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,386 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,245 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,231 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,426 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,452 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,392 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,837 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,733 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,494 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,370 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,873 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,450 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,298 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,154 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 53 | #946 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,111 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,042 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,005 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 72 | #805 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 54 | #948 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 73 | #836 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 60 | #927 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 90 | #752 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 64 | #946 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 62 | #954 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,099 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 63 | #964 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,107 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 64 | #922 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,561 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 61 | #935 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,258 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,433 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,197 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,319 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,429 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,136 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,334 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,389 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,302 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,426 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,239 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 17 | #935 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,075 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,216 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,029 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,107 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 13 | #999 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,284 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,660 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,334 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,372 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,427 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,363 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,564 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,433 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,084 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,091 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,235 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,200 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #981 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lilia reached #8,030 in 1988. As a girl name, it reached #752 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lilia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.