Is Eleanora a boy or girl name?
Eleanora is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 304 girls and 0 boys were named Eleanora, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 8,008 US babies named Eleanora were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #886
- Babies named Eleanora since 1880
- 8,008
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 304 babies
Boys and girls named Eleanora, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 133 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 280 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 381 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,156 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,313 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 692 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 353 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 261 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 142 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 63 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 57 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 82 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 249 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,527 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,319 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 304 | #886 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 278 | #945 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 250 | #1,026 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 255 | #1,002 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 232 | #1,067 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,104 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 249 | #1,037 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 251 | #1,031 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 219 | #1,148 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,471 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,592 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,023 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,607 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,489 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,988 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,597 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,883 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,239 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,859 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,515 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,975 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,975 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,164 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,435 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,370 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,985 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,690 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,557 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,343 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,222 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,843 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,921 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,747 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,605 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,517 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,001 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,285 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,841 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,139 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,464 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,285 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,551 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,029 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,128 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,759 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,709 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,111 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,699 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,542 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,797 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,099 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,584 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,875 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,111 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,855 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,452 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,747 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,805 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,841 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,489 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,840 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,536 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,405 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,181 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,016 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,753 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,466 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,794 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,752 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,816 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,633 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,473 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,024 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,553 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,569 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,360 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,763 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,280 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,156 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,073 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,416 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 53 | #978 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 58 | #932 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 57 | #913 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 60 | #880 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 66 | #852 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 68 | #820 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 71 | #784 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 76 | #776 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 78 | #759 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 105 | #670 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 101 | #696 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 110 | #667 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 118 | #661 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 127 | #637 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 129 | #646 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 152 | #605 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 128 | #655 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 136 | #631 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 164 | #557 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 148 | #591 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 153 | #557 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 170 | #539 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 127 | #605 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 174 | #486 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 153 | #500 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 126 | #497 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 87 | #546 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 55 | #675 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 58 | #560 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 53 | #566 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 47 | #562 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 47 | #539 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 29 | #703 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 39 | #563 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 42 | #531 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 41 | #514 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 34 | #560 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 38 | #520 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 23 | #669 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 41 | #525 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 30 | #553 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 34 | #547 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 33 | #513 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 33 | #520 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 24 | #627 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 30 | #527 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 31 | #491 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 27 | #530 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 18 | #630 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 20 | #585 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 23 | #536 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 17 | #617 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 13 | #642 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 14 | #614 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 19 | #489 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 14 | #565 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 9 | #662 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 11 | #575 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #702 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 6 | #773 |
Highest rank
Eleanora has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #486 in 1916. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eleanora
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.