Is Eleanore a boy or girl name?
Eleanore is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 142 girls and 0 boys were named Eleanore, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 18,567 US babies named Eleanore were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,515
- Babies named Eleanore since 1880
- 18,567
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 768 babies
Boys and girls named Eleanore, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 278 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 613 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 4,807 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 6,319 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 2,628 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 963 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 434 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 198 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 138 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 139 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 215 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 386 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 761 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 581 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,515 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,648 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,874 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,982 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,834 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,949 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,917 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,980 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,211 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,129 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,564 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,777 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,732 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,366 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,914 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,132 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,338 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,734 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,812 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,604 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,976 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,429 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,947 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,596 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,351 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,914 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,061 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,078 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,221 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,511 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,085 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,808 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,801 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,696 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,460 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,281 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,784 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,912 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,025 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,442 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,428 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,358 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,045 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,044 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,750 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,697 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,004 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,285 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,966 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,664 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,097 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,865 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,309 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,657 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,141 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,833 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,363 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,112 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,597 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,282 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,850 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,318 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,373 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,931 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,160 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,954 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,994 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,660 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,666 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,706 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,397 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,477 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,322 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,418 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,226 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,113 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,301 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,060 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,000 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 69 | #906 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 70 | #919 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 113 | #727 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 148 | #615 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 138 | #601 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 168 | #529 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 180 | #497 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 192 | #480 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 215 | #450 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 254 | #399 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 238 | #419 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 259 | #406 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 278 | #386 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 326 | #352 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 324 | #358 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 362 | #345 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 387 | #330 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 454 | #309 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 535 | #288 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 613 | #269 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 653 | #260 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 719 | #248 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 729 | #240 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 724 | #242 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 768 | #235 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 737 | #240 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 737 | #233 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 761 | #228 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 708 | #231 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 724 | #225 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 570 | #248 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 438 | #250 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 313 | #261 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 253 | #287 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 159 | #313 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 144 | #317 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 88 | #390 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 91 | #377 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 71 | #424 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 67 | #417 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 56 | #452 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 66 | #400 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 52 | #444 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 42 | #486 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 43 | #453 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 37 | #570 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 28 | #579 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 46 | #451 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 33 | #514 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 31 | #538 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 22 | #664 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 28 | #547 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 24 | #580 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 22 | #598 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 23 | #546 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 21 | #574 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 10 | #856 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 18 | #596 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 15 | #595 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 8 | #853 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 12 | #637 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 8 | #808 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 11 | #595 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #763 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 5 | #858 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 13 | #476 |
Highest rank
Eleanore has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #225 in 1916. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eleanore
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.