Is Elwood a boy or girl name?
Elwood is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 69 boys were named Elwood, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 20,755 US babies named Elwood were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,134
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Elwood since 1880
- 20,755
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 625 babies
Boys and girls named Elwood, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 274 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 356 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 504 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 3,908 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 5,494 | 40 | 0.7% |
| 1930s | 3,553 | 13 | 0.4% |
| 1940s | 2,593 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,642 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 879 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 421 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 233 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 146 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 115 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 339 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 245 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 69 | #2,134 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 41 | #3,016 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 43 | #2,929 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 50 | #2,593 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 42 | #2,855 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 33 | #3,438 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 39 | #3,009 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 43 | #2,811 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 51 | #2,485 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 52 | #2,439 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 36 | #3,107 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 29 | #3,603 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 20 | #4,745 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 17 | #5,271 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 19 | #4,893 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 15 | #5,888 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 13 | #6,511 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 13 | #6,367 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 11 | #7,066 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | #6,768 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 12 | #6,245 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 10 | #6,877 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 5 | #11,213 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,149 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 14 | #5,116 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 15 | #4,603 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 15 | #4,473 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 15 | #4,312 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 17 | #3,882 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 7 | #7,238 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 15 | #4,154 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 11 | #5,115 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 11 | #4,988 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 20 | #3,154 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,091 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 29 | #2,317 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,113 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 17 | #2,985 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 21 | #2,545 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 17 | #2,865 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 17 | #2,732 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 19 | #2,514 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 30 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 32 | #1,781 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 34 | #1,708 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,726 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 42 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 25 | #1,962 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 41 | #1,396 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 37 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 39 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 50 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 43 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 57 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 54 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 65 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 66 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 69 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 77 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 75 | #851 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 103 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 93 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 108 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 104 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 119 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 120 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 131 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 144 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 153 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 157 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 192 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 164 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 194 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 208 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 179 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 206 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 239 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 270 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 239 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 223 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 253 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 287 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 285 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 303 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 288 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 280 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 315 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 326 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 299 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 314 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 375 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 385 | #268 | 8 | #3,197 |
| 1932 | 375 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 422 | #269 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 462 | #260 | 5 | #4,749 |
| 1929 | 405 | #275 | 5 | #4,794 |
| 1928 | 479 | #258 | 5 | #4,934 |
| 1927 | 534 | #244 | 7 | #3,979 |
| 1926 | 542 | #240 | 5 | #5,076 |
| 1925 | 571 | #229 | 6 | #4,584 |
| 1924 | 606 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 566 | #234 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 592 | #227 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 613 | #215 | 12 | #2,826 |
| 1920 | 586 | #220 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 589 | #211 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 572 | #215 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 528 | #212 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 526 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 529 | #204 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 373 | #215 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 322 | #206 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 262 | #212 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 114 | #237 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 93 | #250 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 66 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 59 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 52 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 49 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 36 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 52 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 58 | #241 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 33 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 48 | #251 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 51 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 34 | #300 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 35 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 49 | #250 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 35 | #317 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 43 | #269 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 33 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 29 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 40 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 34 | #278 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 24 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 29 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 31 | #325 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 24 | #333 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 31 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 28 | #321 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 26 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 24 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 29 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 29 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 23 | #356 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elwood reached #204 in 1915. As a girl name, it reached #2,826 in 1921. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.