Is Erwin a boy or girl name?
Erwin is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 57 boys were named Erwin, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 21,202 US babies named Erwin were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,422
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Erwin since 1880
- 21,202
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 513 babies
Boys and girls named Erwin, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 217 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 404 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 569 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 3,350 | 14 | 0.4% |
| 1920s | 4,480 | 22 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 2,622 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,673 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,758 | 7 | 0.4% |
| 1960s | 1,451 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 913 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 989 | 6 | 0.6% |
| 1990s | 899 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 947 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 618 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 263 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 57 | #2,422 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 54 | #2,488 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 51 | #2,623 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 48 | #2,664 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 53 | #2,444 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 51 | #2,562 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 50 | #2,556 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 46 | #2,689 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 53 | #2,419 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 48 | #2,576 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 66 | #2,101 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 61 | #2,169 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 71 | #1,993 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 81 | #1,784 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 91 | #1,689 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 94 | #1,672 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 80 | #1,831 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 106 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 93 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 109 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 101 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 94 | #1,413 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 98 | #1,348 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 80 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 92 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 76 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 55 | #1,818 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 66 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 80 | #1,348 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 79 | #1,321 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 95 | #1,172 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 111 | #1,051 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 123 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 126 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 88 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 112 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 86 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 103 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 103 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 96 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 89 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 87 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 88 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 114 | #824 | 6 | #9,445 |
| 1980 | 111 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 84 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 87 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 92 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 76 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 79 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 80 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 91 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 107 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 109 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 108 | #790 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 121 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 91 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 136 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 130 | #649 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 137 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 171 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 155 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 156 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 165 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 189 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 187 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 193 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 219 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 194 | #539 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 175 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 177 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 156 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 155 | #563 | 7 | #4,613 |
| 1951 | 161 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 141 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 145 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 187 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 137 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 167 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 151 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 158 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 212 | #427 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 196 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 136 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 184 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 157 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 212 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 197 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 248 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 249 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 285 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 262 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 308 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 334 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 370 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 378 | #286 | 6 | #4,231 |
| 1928 | 394 | #283 | 6 | #4,352 |
| 1927 | 410 | #280 | 5 | #5,035 |
| 1926 | 462 | #266 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 429 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 501 | #257 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 444 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 508 | #249 | 5 | #5,251 |
| 1921 | 494 | #253 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 460 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 443 | #251 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 512 | #233 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 479 | #228 | 8 | #3,450 |
| 1916 | 484 | #222 | 6 | #4,079 |
| 1915 | 423 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 360 | #222 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 275 | #228 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 210 | #243 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 92 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 72 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 76 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 59 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 47 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 65 | #244 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 58 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 52 | #266 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 57 | #244 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 49 | #270 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 63 | #216 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 43 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 46 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 48 | #259 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 46 | #260 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 50 | #257 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 46 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 35 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 33 | #302 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 32 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 33 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 35 | #291 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 29 | #327 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 28 | #349 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 24 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 22 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 26 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 17 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 26 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 12 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 17 | #422 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 16 | #446 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Erwin reached #216 in 1901. As a girl name, it reached #3,450 in 1917. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Erwin
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.