Is Roscoe a boy or girl name?
Roscoe is mostly a boy name in the US. In 2024, 6 girls and 67 boys were named Roscoe, so 8.2% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 22,107 US babies named Roscoe were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,180
- Girl rank, 2024
- #14,887
- Babies named Roscoe since 1880
- 22,107
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 604 babies
Boys and girls named Roscoe, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 969 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 850 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 916 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 3,803 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 4,503 | 5 | 0.1% |
| 1930s | 2,579 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 2,322 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,927 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,111 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 769 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 636 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 344 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 363 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 634 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 370 | 6 | 1.6% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67 | #2,180 | 6 | #14,887 |
| 2023 | 63 | #2,267 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 81 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 79 | #1,927 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 80 | #1,863 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 77 | #1,928 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 82 | #1,851 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 63 | #2,168 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 64 | #2,161 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 71 | #2,032 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 71 | #2,016 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 60 | #2,199 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 55 | #2,350 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 47 | #2,620 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 44 | #2,778 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 42 | #2,884 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 47 | #2,668 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 33 | #3,367 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 29 | #3,590 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 38 | #2,835 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 40 | #2,682 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 35 | #2,835 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 36 | #2,672 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 30 | #3,046 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 33 | #2,793 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 32 | #2,714 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 25 | #3,169 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 22 | #3,329 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 22 | #3,277 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 34 | #2,337 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 40 | #2,075 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 31 | #2,442 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 45 | #1,834 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 49 | #1,693 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 44 | #1,806 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 58 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 45 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 54 | #1,376 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 68 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 52 | #1,348 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 56 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 71 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 75 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 80 | #1,020 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 77 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 70 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 81 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 73 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 85 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 66 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 85 | #879 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 72 | #954 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 75 | #926 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 74 | #954 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 88 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 75 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 85 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 91 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 109 | #712 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 91 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 112 | #727 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 123 | #700 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 137 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 131 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 157 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 174 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 154 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 188 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 178 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 171 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 186 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 199 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 233 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 210 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 234 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 206 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 235 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 225 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 222 | #428 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 227 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 250 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 241 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 226 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 277 | #351 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 213 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 233 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 224 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 220 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 241 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 237 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 273 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 270 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 268 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 261 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 352 | #303 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 349 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 344 | #300 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 372 | #301 | 5 | #5,485 |
| 1926 | 405 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 455 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 443 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 476 | #259 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 505 | #250 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 550 | #238 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 604 | #214 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 586 | #213 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 561 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 468 | #232 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 494 | #217 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 505 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 361 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 301 | #214 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 264 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 127 | #228 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 136 | #194 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 107 | #203 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 97 | #211 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 95 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 90 | #196 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 87 | #200 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 98 | #184 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 69 | #218 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 90 | #185 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 87 | #171 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 96 | #198 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 84 | #173 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 73 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 74 | #198 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 84 | #195 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 91 | #174 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 90 | #170 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 88 | #165 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 96 | #165 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 71 | #182 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 99 | #145 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 83 | #164 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 141 | #117 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 102 | #128 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 88 | #159 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 98 | #138 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 92 | #149 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 92 | #138 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 81 | #168 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 102 | #118 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 90 | #152 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roscoe reached #117 in 1888. As a girl name, it reached #5,485 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.