Is Ruthie a boy or girl name?
Ruthie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 305 girls and 0 boys were named Ruthie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 22,303 US babies named Ruthie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #885
- Babies named Ruthie since 1880
- 22,303
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 428 babies
Boys and girls named Ruthie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 66 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 174 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 318 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,197 | 100% |
| 1920s | 7 | 3,408 | 99.8% |
| 1930s | 25 | 3,785 | 99.3% |
| 1940s | 0 | 3,945 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 3,295 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,660 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 590 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 365 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 241 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 717 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,240 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,270 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 305 | #885 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 289 | #920 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 260 | #1,007 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 234 | #1,073 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 182 | #1,253 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 160 | #1,410 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,363 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,601 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,610 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 134 | #1,606 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,873 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,806 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,061 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 89 | #2,154 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,973 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 98 | #2,087 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,898 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,564 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,123 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,338 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,225 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,765 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,667 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,305 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,375 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,299 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,117 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,632 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,160 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,392 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,243 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,351 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,217 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,306 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,094 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,870 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,402 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,900 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,504 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,691 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,048 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,348 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,570 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,765 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,731 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,869 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,554 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,453 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,050 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,833 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,561 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,617 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,376 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,289 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,235 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,225 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,108 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 111 | #973 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 120 | #926 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 150 | #813 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 191 | #754 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 196 | #733 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 211 | #712 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 232 | #681 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 271 | #608 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 287 | #584 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 285 | #589 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 322 | #534 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 327 | #520 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 307 | #525 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 331 | #484 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 367 | #451 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 378 | #442 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 314 | #472 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 377 | #412 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 397 | #400 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 400 | #399 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 414 | #392 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 422 | #367 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 376 | #360 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 394 | #346 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 374 | #370 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 410 | #345 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 357 | #347 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 401 | #317 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,894 | 389 | #315 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 388 | #317 |
| 1937 | 7 | #3,132 | 378 | #318 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 369 | #321 |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,211 | 396 | #314 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 377 | #322 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 367 | #328 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 365 | #333 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 359 | #337 |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,941 | 397 | #330 |
| 1929 | 7 | #3,506 | 381 | #331 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 385 | #345 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 428 | #326 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 411 | #326 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 381 | #346 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 374 | #356 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 321 | #371 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 250 | #418 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 244 | #440 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 233 | #442 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 191 | #483 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 177 | #522 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 148 | #556 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 146 | #556 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 121 | #592 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 107 | #546 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 96 | #520 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 89 | #514 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 63 | #528 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 59 | #535 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 38 | #641 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 47 | #545 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 39 | #598 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 42 | #548 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 31 | #639 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 25 | #708 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 27 | #652 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 22 | #752 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 26 | #627 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 21 | #827 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 18 | #785 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 22 | #712 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 22 | #674 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 24 | #648 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 27 | #592 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 15 | #809 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 17 | #735 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 12 | #900 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 11 | #884 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,319 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 12 | #792 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 10 | #883 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 9 | #845 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 7 | #911 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,152 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 6 | #910 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #886 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #809 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 5 | #925 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ruthie reached #3,132 in 1937. As a girl name, it reached #314 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ruthie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.