Is Ritchie a boy or girl name?
Ritchie is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 25 boys were named Ritchie, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.2% of the 4,142 US babies named Ritchie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,285
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ritchie since 1914
- 4,142
- Most popular year
- 1964
- 153 babies
Boys and girls named Ritchie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 13 | 11 | 45.8% |
| 1920s | 55 | 6 | 9.8% |
| 1930s | 80 | 5 | 5.9% |
| 1940s | 222 | 23 | 9.4% |
| 1950s | 818 | 5 | 0.6% |
| 1960s | 1,035 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 580 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 298 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 359 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 203 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 278 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 151 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | #4,285 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 28 | #3,973 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 37 | #3,264 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 28 | #3,894 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 33 | #3,395 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 48 | #2,681 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 29 | #3,772 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 28 | #3,867 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 29 | #3,752 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 24 | #4,265 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 29 | #3,673 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 22 | #4,432 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 22 | #4,500 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 29 | #3,679 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 18 | #5,202 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,137 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,333 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 13 | #6,534 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 21 | #4,474 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 27 | #3,594 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 18 | #4,747 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 15 | #5,216 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 23 | #3,752 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 29 | #3,126 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 18 | #4,344 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 32 | #2,711 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 30 | #2,769 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 26 | #2,964 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 31 | #2,525 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 27 | #2,746 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 28 | #2,669 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 37 | #2,155 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 43 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 53 | #1,608 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 52 | #1,609 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 41 | #1,852 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 55 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 33 | #1,930 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 24 | #2,346 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 24 | #2,281 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 22 | #2,348 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 26 | #2,067 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 16 | #2,949 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 28 | #1,980 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 29 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 32 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 38 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 34 | #1,635 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 46 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 44 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 63 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 78 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 72 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 86 | #882 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 87 | #866 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 90 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 105 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 131 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 127 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 118 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 153 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 121 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 96 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 40 | #1,259 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 54 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 71 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 43 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 84 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 103 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 92 | #762 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 122 | #658 | 5 | #6,448 |
| 1953 | 82 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 81 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 90 | #735 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 50 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 47 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 34 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 27 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 27 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 12 | #2,108 | 6 | #4,444 |
| 1944 | 15 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 18 | #1,752 | 5 | #5,237 |
| 1942 | 19 | #1,668 | 5 | #5,235 |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,180 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 11 | #2,292 | 7 | #3,787 |
| 1939 | 13 | #2,033 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,450 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 13 | #2,070 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,809 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 6 | #3,586 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 10 | #2,508 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 5 | #4,186 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 7 | #3,338 | 5 | #4,856 |
| 1930 | 8 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,875 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 7 | #3,643 | 6 | #4,621 |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,710 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 6 | #4,099 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,791 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,751 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 7 | #3,804 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 8 | #3,436 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,494 |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,810 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,835 |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,855 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ritchie reached #628 in 1964. As a girl name, it reached #3,787 in 1940. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ritchie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.