Is Lorne a boy or girl name?
Lorne was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 1.2% of the 4,347 US babies named Lorne were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #11,761
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lorne since 1903
- 4,347
- Most popular year
- 1965
- 188 babies
Boys and girls named Lorne, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 20 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 168 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 289 | 12 | 4% |
| 1930s | 249 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 235 | 5 | 2.1% |
| 1950s | 243 | 6 | 2.4% |
| 1960s | 1,441 | 17 | 1.2% |
| 1970s | 660 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 473 | 10 | 2.1% |
| 1990s | 258 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 134 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 94 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 33 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | #11,761 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 7 | #10,350 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 6 | #11,733 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 8 | #9,353 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 6 | #11,438 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 7 | #10,397 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 11 | #7,422 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 10 | #7,918 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 6 | #11,603 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 17 | #5,430 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,351 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 8 | #9,334 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 8 | #9,381 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,510 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 7 | #10,335 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 10 | #8,066 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,279 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 8 | #9,414 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 17 | #5,219 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #10,949 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 11 | #6,810 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 10 | #7,042 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 18 | #4,426 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 21 | #3,924 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 19 | #4,150 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 16 | #4,470 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 21 | #3,562 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,514 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 19 | #3,628 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 17 | #3,786 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 38 | #2,153 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 25 | #2,836 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 35 | #2,201 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 34 | #2,177 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 42 | #1,861 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 32 | #2,183 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 36 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 47 | #1,520 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 42 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 53 | #1,325 | 5 | #11,706 |
| 1984 | 48 | #1,377 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 61 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 43 | #1,475 | 5 | #11,499 |
| 1981 | 55 | #1,243 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 56 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 49 | #1,333 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 45 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 30 | #1,766 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 53 | #1,184 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 49 | #1,221 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 66 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 65 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 95 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 92 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 116 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 131 | #692 | 5 | #8,125 |
| 1968 | 147 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 145 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 186 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 182 | #568 | 6 | #6,211 |
| 1964 | 179 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 159 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 171 | #595 | 6 | #6,268 |
| 1961 | 92 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 49 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 24 | #1,649 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 26 | #1,548 | 6 | #5,809 |
| 1957 | 25 | #1,613 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 27 | #1,524 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 30 | #1,411 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 28 | #1,454 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 13 | #2,245 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 22 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 21 | #1,639 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 29 | #1,369 | 5 | #5,683 |
| 1948 | 29 | #1,369 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 27 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 20 | #1,625 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 11 | #2,202 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 22 | #1,464 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 30 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 22 | #1,516 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 20 | #1,565 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 25 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 28 | #1,258 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 18 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 27 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 26 | #1,308 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 25 | #1,385 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 27 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 21 | #1,524 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 28 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 18 | #1,748 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 31 | #1,293 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 22 | #1,590 | 5 | #4,986 |
| 1928 | 28 | #1,404 | 7 | #4,009 |
| 1927 | 35 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 38 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 33 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 27 | #1,475 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 25 | #1,529 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 21 | #1,735 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 37 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 23 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 23 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 29 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 23 | #1,512 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 22 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 19 | #1,638 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 21 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 6 | #2,673 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 11 | #1,584 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 7 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 7 | #1,373 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 7 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 8 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lorne reached #561 in 1966. As a girl name, it reached #4,009 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lorne
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.