Is Ruthanne a boy or girl name?
Ruthanne is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 16 girls and 0 boys were named Ruthanne, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,667 US babies named Ruthanne were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,171
- Babies named Ruthanne since 1918
- 2,667
- Most popular year
- 1946
- 90 babies
Boys and girls named Ruthanne, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 117 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 197 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 634 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 372 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 386 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 179 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 206 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 160 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 172 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 144 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 81 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,171 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,187 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,166 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,432 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,592 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,215 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,045 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,212 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,172 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,212 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,872 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,974 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,395 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,261 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,325 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,299 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,379 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,666 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,089 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,768 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,326 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,562 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,335 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,905 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,424 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,426 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,755 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,192 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,243 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,948 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,923 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,629 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,236 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,880 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,485 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,227 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,780 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,621 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,737 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,287 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,502 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,077 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,874 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,127 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,474 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,669 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,364 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,028 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,789 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,539 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,995 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,120 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,725 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,040 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,206 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,440 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,852 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,260 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,760 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,615 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,800 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,007 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,552 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,738 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,784 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,474 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,015 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,921 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,829 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,795 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,978 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,963 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,503 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,693 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,282 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,187 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,323 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,160 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 90 | #878 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,075 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 76 | #880 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,047 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 76 | #900 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 55 | #991 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 55 | #969 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,036 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,313 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,232 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,134 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,549 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,546 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,147 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,474 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,291 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,020 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,406 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,131 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,674 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,019 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,602 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,398 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,090 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,936 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,122 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,643 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,975 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,803 |
Highest rank
Ruthanne has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #878 in 1946. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ruthanne
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.