Is Roxanne a boy or girl name?
Roxanne is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 182 girls and 0 boys were named Roxanne, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 59,414 US babies named Roxanne were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,275
- Babies named Roxanne since 1906
- 59,414
- Most popular year
- 1954
- 2,232 babies
Boys and girls named Roxanne, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 71 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 363 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,987 | 100% |
| 1950s | 10 | 16,608 | 99.9% |
| 1960s | 6 | 13,577 | 100% |
| 1970s | 5 | 8,169 | 99.9% |
| 1980s | 34 | 9,045 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 0 | 4,286 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,154 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,129 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 946 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 182 | #1,275 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 172 | #1,321 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,372 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 208 | #1,177 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 215 | #1,125 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 198 | #1,189 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,267 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 190 | #1,249 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,284 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,323 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,169 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 253 | #993 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 245 | #1,036 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 245 | #1,021 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 236 | #1,053 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 258 | #1,018 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 234 | #1,106 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,198 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 207 | #1,181 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 225 | #1,064 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,046 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,148 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,083 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 186 | #1,130 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 225 | #951 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 237 | #896 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 256 | #833 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 266 | #783 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 330 | #672 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 340 | #640 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 376 | #599 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 459 | #527 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 585 | #431 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 634 | #404 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 803 | #336 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 975 | #277 |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,642 | 1,191 | #218 |
| 1987 | 11 | #4,189 | 1,021 | #250 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 811 | #302 |
| 1985 | 5 | #7,377 | 878 | #285 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 749 | #317 |
| 1983 | 5 | #7,122 | 818 | #288 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 880 | #277 |
| 1981 | 5 | #7,074 | 852 | #285 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 870 | #285 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 879 | #278 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 760 | #308 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 751 | #316 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 679 | #329 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 744 | #309 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 722 | #317 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 702 | #322 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 883 | #288 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 1,036 | #279 |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,307 | 1,013 | #289 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 1,090 | #268 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 1,016 | #267 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 1,004 | #268 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 1,186 | #245 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 1,271 | #242 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 1,324 | #241 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 1,527 | #220 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 1,515 | #219 |
| 1961 | 6 | #3,994 | 1,724 | #202 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 1,920 | #193 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,479 | 1,707 | #202 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 1,586 | #205 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 1,774 | #198 |
| 1956 | 5 | #4,375 | 2,114 | #172 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 2,092 | #165 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 2,232 | #158 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 1,763 | #179 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 1,578 | #187 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 1,080 | #234 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 682 | #297 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 331 | #436 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 290 | #471 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 270 | #503 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 232 | #517 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 198 | #519 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 175 | #549 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 179 | #566 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 107 | #724 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 115 | #662 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 90 | #733 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 66 | #865 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 62 | #903 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 54 | #949 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 53 | #949 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,350 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,474 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,543 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,623 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,192 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,019 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,352 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,126 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,818 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,850 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,615 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,317 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,926 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,326 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,186 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,731 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,619 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,917 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roxanne reached #3,994 in 1961. As a girl name, it reached #158 in 1954. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roxanne
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.