Is Roxana a boy or girl name?
Roxana is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 92 girls and 0 boys were named Roxana, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 11,942 US babies named Roxana were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,091
- Babies named Roxana since 1882
- 11,942
- Most popular year
- 1987
- 320 babies
Boys and girls named Roxana, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 133 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 185 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 395 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 588 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 690 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 944 | 100% |
| 1980s | 20 | 2,272 | 99.1% |
| 1990s | 6 | 2,516 | 99.8% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,304 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,270 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 478 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,091 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,173 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,066 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,002 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,837 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,860 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,975 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,888 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,894 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 127 | #1,683 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,918 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,752 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,564 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,264 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,387 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 225 | #1,128 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 207 | #1,226 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 221 | #1,160 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 245 | #1,049 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 252 | #974 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 243 | #980 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 198 | #1,116 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 268 | #861 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 248 | #913 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,057 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 196 | #1,043 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 179 | #1,087 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 186 | #1,035 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 256 | #804 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 248 | #803 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 262 | #782 |
| 1993 | 6 | #8,501 | 286 | #736 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 278 | #756 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 315 | #681 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 310 | #686 |
| 1989 | 7 | #6,795 | 301 | #680 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 309 | #644 |
| 1987 | 7 | #5,978 | 313 | #619 |
| 1986 | 6 | #6,577 | 279 | #665 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 232 | #748 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 189 | #831 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 207 | #773 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 176 | #879 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,032 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,104 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,281 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,305 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,222 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,110 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,247 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,079 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,414 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,203 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,144 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,327 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,207 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,487 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,265 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,509 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,345 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,380 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,269 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,275 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,394 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,363 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,736 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,556 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,625 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,150 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,156 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,223 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,387 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,331 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,169 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,182 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,086 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,153 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,483 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,461 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,285 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,235 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,391 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,661 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,531 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,021 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,417 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,744 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,293 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,408 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,651 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,644 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,830 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,803 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,405 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,985 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,288 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,401 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,817 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,849 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,178 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,792 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,886 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,955 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,361 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,877 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,780 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,650 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,658 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,499 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,096 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,126 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,963 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,495 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,343 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,916 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,128 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,039 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,999 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,408 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,424 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,503 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 11 | #832 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,256 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,150 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,010 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roxana reached #5,978 in 1987. As a girl name, it reached #619 in 1987. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roxana
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.