Is Roxanna a boy or girl name?
Roxanna is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 48 girls and 0 boys were named Roxanna, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 13,405 US babies named Roxanna were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,313
- Babies named Roxanna since 1880
- 13,405
- Most popular year
- 1988
- 316 babies
Boys and girls named Roxanna, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 58 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 71 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 159 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 202 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 331 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 758 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,843 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,034 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,432 | 100% |
| 1980s | 7 | 2,092 | 99.7% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,570 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,433 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,058 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 295 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,313 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,928 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,680 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,917 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,591 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,367 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,157 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,254 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,144 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,056 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,888 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,016 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,728 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,597 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 163 | #1,413 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 148 | #1,534 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,596 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,555 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,520 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 133 | #1,544 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 152 | #1,378 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 150 | #1,357 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,415 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,276 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,489 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,441 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,519 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,465 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 162 | #1,122 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 171 | #1,052 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,088 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 174 | #1,056 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 148 | #1,187 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 190 | #990 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 212 | #909 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 254 | #769 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 316 | #630 |
| 1987 | 7 | #5,979 | 301 | #634 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 195 | #852 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 189 | #855 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 167 | #897 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 185 | #831 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 184 | #847 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 184 | #850 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,160 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 146 | #983 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,066 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,038 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 132 | #969 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 143 | #914 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,007 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 135 | #914 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 169 | #803 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 173 | #808 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 161 | #843 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 177 | #761 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 162 | #790 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 150 | #814 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 179 | #739 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 180 | #748 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 172 | #796 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 250 | #642 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 237 | #660 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 272 | #619 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 255 | #635 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 180 | #760 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 176 | #751 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 173 | #759 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 204 | #675 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 208 | #645 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 245 | #575 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 175 | #684 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 156 | #714 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 177 | #654 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 149 | #705 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 100 | #884 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 106 | #853 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 91 | #933 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 95 | #852 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 79 | #849 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 72 | #907 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 77 | #892 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,175 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,083 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,087 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,086 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,087 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 51 | #989 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 49 | #991 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,409 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,340 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,709 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,810 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,861 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,601 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,086 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,773 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,877 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,987 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,105 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,984 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,015 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,015 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,912 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,158 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,641 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,871 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,762 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,114 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,128 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,594 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,748 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,819 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,160 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,412 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,526 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,218 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,235 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 14 | #965 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,760 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,212 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,159 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,562 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,042 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,367 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,774 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,464 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,620 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,425 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,080 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,183 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,455 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 9 | #949 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 9 | #818 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,027 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 7 | #915 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,032 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 8 | #731 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 9 | #624 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roxanna reached #5,979 in 1987. As a girl name, it reached #575 in 1954. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roxanna
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.