Is Renata a boy or girl name?
Renata is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 594 girls and 0 boys were named Renata, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 13,979 US babies named Renata were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #517
- Babies named Renata since 1900
- 13,979
- Most popular year
- 1980
- 726 babies
Boys and girls named Renata, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 88 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 503 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 893 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 753 | 100% |
| 1980s | 6 | 1,727 | 99.7% |
| 1990s | 0 | 580 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,321 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,726 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 3,068 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 594 | #517 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 653 | #472 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 640 | #492 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 581 | #533 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 600 | #507 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 645 | #487 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 613 | #506 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 685 | #461 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 576 | #544 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 447 | #637 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 435 | #659 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 350 | #777 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 371 | #751 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 362 | #762 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 242 | #1,034 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 209 | #1,204 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 248 | #1,056 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 219 | #1,165 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,373 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,873 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,036 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,297 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,373 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 75 | #2,186 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,329 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,281 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,487 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,386 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,390 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,897 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,341 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,440 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,073 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,342 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,682 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,994 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,886 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,544 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,432 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,282 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,188 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,135 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,014 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 224 | #737 |
| 1980 | 6 | #6,078 | 720 | #336 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 229 | #727 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,038 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,946 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,743 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,750 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,681 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,726 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,604 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,426 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,342 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,288 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,277 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,129 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,271 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,065 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 153 | #843 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,167 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,244 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,144 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,326 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,035 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,289 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,237 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,202 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,663 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,557 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,776 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,738 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,787 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,413 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,260 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,943 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,947 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,996 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,437 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,228 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,226 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,197 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,165 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,892 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,703 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,117 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,270 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,518 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,515 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,435 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,817 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,480 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,692 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,239 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,228 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,317 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,790 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,085 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,648 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,034 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,864 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,775 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,796 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,085 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,476 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,125 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,535 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,771 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,786 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,560 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,177 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Renata reached #6,078 in 1980. As a girl name, it reached #336 in 1980. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Renata
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.