Is Elmore a boy or girl name?
Elmore was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 3,967 US babies named Elmore were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Elmore since 1880
- 3,967
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 131 babies
Boys and girls named Elmore, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 117 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 154 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 206 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 789 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 849 | 10 | 1.2% |
| 1930s | 554 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 484 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 394 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 176 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 145 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 5 | #12,685 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 5 | #11,970 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 6 | #10,357 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 5 | #11,209 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,442 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 5 | #9,279 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 8 | #6,008 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 9 | #5,303 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 5 | #7,627 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 6 | #6,180 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 8 | #4,832 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 10 | #4,027 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 6 | #5,712 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 6 | #5,737 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 13 | #3,222 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 11 | #3,468 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 13 | #3,086 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 5 | #5,866 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 17 | #2,476 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,589 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 20 | #2,068 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 14 | #2,572 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 22 | #1,941 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 15 | #2,428 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 8 | #3,401 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 14 | #2,235 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,518 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 21 | #1,697 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 15 | #2,112 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 12 | #2,456 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 23 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,828 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 26 | #1,579 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 26 | #1,597 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 24 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 38 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,521 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 33 | #1,346 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 46 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 48 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 47 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 43 | #1,122 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 47 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 41 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 57 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 51 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 46 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 45 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 51 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 56 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 58 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 41 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 42 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 37 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 49 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 45 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 44 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 53 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 50 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 48 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 66 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 60 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 68 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 71 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 63 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 58 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 67 | #813 | 5 | #5,018 |
| 1926 | 82 | #701 | 5 | #5,068 |
| 1925 | 88 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 87 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 108 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 115 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 96 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 85 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 102 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 131 | #530 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 96 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 86 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 119 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 80 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 64 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 56 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 24 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 31 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 28 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 20 | #568 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 26 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 19 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 25 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 19 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 13 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 9 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 31 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 13 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 20 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 14 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 24 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 19 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 11 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 9 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 14 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 18 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 12 | #576 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 14 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 16 | #487 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 10 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 11 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 18 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 11 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 10 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 13 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 9 | #650 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elmore reached #402 in 1896. As a girl name, it reached #5,018 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Elmore
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.