Is Jettie a boy or girl name?
Jettie was mostly a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 94.9% of the 3,853 US babies named Jettie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #14,198
- Babies named Jettie since 1880
- 3,853
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 109 babies
Boys and girls named Jettie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 169 | 100% |
| 1890s | 7 | 271 | 97.5% |
| 1900s | 0 | 341 | 100% |
| 1910s | 56 | 634 | 91.9% |
| 1920s | 38 | 738 | 95.1% |
| 1930s | 49 | 550 | 91.8% |
| 1940s | 20 | 390 | 95.1% |
| 1950s | 22 | 234 | 91.4% |
| 1960s | 0 | 110 | 100% |
| 1970s | 5 | 63 | 92.6% |
| 1980s | 0 | 47 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 48 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,198 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,628 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,346 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,250 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,188 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,568 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,613 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,005 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,165 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,454 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,721 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,787 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,246 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,309 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,190 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,055 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,096 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,683 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,430 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,079 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,372 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,487 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,516 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,703 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,039 |
| 1979 | 5 | #6,505 | 12 | #5,549 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,401 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,865 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,876 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,411 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,314 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,838 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,759 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,617 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,208 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,168 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,059 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,326 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,207 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,888 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,501 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,523 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,540 |
| 1959 | 9 | #2,927 | 18 | #2,806 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,910 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,086 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,287 |
| 1955 | 5 | #4,125 | 21 | #2,433 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,741 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,329 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,907 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,624 |
| 1950 | 8 | #2,896 | 38 | #1,510 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,241 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,429 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,385 |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,762 | 43 | #1,327 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,531 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,162 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,207 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,314 |
| 1941 | 6 | #3,313 | 39 | #1,213 |
| 1940 | 9 | #2,578 | 43 | #1,111 |
| 1939 | 6 | #3,286 | 49 | #1,016 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,026 |
| 1937 | 7 | #3,042 | 53 | #957 |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,806 | 57 | #905 |
| 1935 | 6 | #3,445 | 57 | #916 |
| 1934 | 7 | #3,140 | 46 | #1,025 |
| 1933 | 5 | #3,909 | 48 | #1,004 |
| 1932 | 8 | #2,980 | 64 | #870 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 65 | #859 |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,274 | 62 | #931 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,274 | 57 | #952 |
| 1928 | 6 | #3,925 | 61 | #958 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 73 | #866 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 57 | #992 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 79 | #837 |
| 1924 | 8 | #3,372 | 77 | #854 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 89 | #775 |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,631 | 82 | #804 |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,104 | 81 | #818 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,629 | 82 | #802 |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,950 | 68 | #846 |
| 1918 | 6 | #3,933 | 103 | #713 |
| 1917 | 8 | #3,061 | 75 | #798 |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,638 | 64 | #851 |
| 1915 | 10 | #2,535 | 77 | #754 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 69 | #695 |
| 1913 | 10 | #1,876 | 52 | #728 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 36 | #841 |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,637 | 51 | #598 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 39 | #685 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 35 | #677 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 25 | #779 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 38 | #606 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 37 | #583 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 37 | #574 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 38 | #539 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 36 | #543 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 29 | #616 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 27 | #609 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 39 | #547 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 31 | #543 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 31 | #583 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 30 | #544 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 28 | #588 |
| 1895 | 7 | #934 | 37 | #484 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 24 | #601 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 27 | #538 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 19 | #675 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 27 | #500 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 17 | #656 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 28 | #470 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 29 | #461 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 20 | #502 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 21 | #485 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 10 | #714 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 16 | #530 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 13 | #553 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 15 | #480 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 8 | #650 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 9 | #606 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jettie reached #934 in 1895. As a girl name, it reached #461 in 1888. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jettie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.