Is Judge a boy or girl name?
Judge is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 46 boys were named Judge, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,777 US babies named Judge were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,802
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Judge since 1880
- 3,777
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 65 babies
Boys and girls named Judge, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 201 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 177 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 185 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 461 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 549 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 393 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 301 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 277 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 135 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 107 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 153 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 207 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 294 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 224 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46 | #2,802 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 42 | #2,973 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 48 | #2,733 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 53 | #2,514 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 35 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 43 | #2,875 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 39 | #3,021 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 45 | #2,738 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 30 | #3,642 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 27 | #3,934 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 25 | #4,066 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 16 | #5,525 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 22 | #4,461 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,087 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 29 | #3,670 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 21 | #4,665 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 13 | #6,583 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 19 | #4,897 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 23 | #4,152 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 23 | #3,990 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 26 | #3,581 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 26 | #3,485 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,559 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 27 | #3,274 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 16 | #4,685 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 27 | #3,064 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 18 | #3,923 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 9 | #6,357 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 22 | #3,252 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 14 | #4,400 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 17 | #3,821 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,855 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 14 | #4,222 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 10 | #5,290 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 10 | #5,182 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 10 | #4,998 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,147 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 9 | #4,747 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,759 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 14 | #3,302 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 10 | #4,065 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 14 | #3,201 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 11 | #3,730 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 10 | #3,984 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 11 | #3,688 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,300 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 10 | #3,724 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 12 | #3,167 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 17 | #2,498 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 9 | #3,698 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 12 | #2,936 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 10 | #3,249 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 5 | #5,279 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 15 | #2,447 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 10 | #2,956 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 13 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 12 | #2,411 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 11 | #2,545 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 14 | #2,220 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 10 | #2,750 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 12 | #2,477 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 15 | #2,150 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 16 | #2,101 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 22 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,891 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 20 | #1,805 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,533 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 21 | #1,745 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 21 | #1,708 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 30 | #1,397 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 38 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 34 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 40 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 27 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 30 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 29 | #1,365 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 28 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 31 | #1,271 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 32 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 25 | #1,350 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 32 | #1,231 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 30 | #1,221 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 40 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 20 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 41 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 30 | #1,221 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 35 | #1,110 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 39 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 54 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 30 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 45 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 47 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 52 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 47 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 30 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 56 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 64 | #826 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 58 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 62 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 55 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 60 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 52 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 65 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 65 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 62 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 59 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 58 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 49 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 34 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 38 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 44 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 15 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 37 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 29 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 14 | #727 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 17 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 22 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 16 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 21 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 18 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 27 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 12 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 21 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 15 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 14 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 22 | #423 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 14 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 19 | #423 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 20 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 25 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 15 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 20 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 23 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 18 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 20 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 16 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 21 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 24 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 20 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 14 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 25 | #346 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Judge reached #344 in 1883. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.