Is Eda a boy or girl name?
Eda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 20 girls and 0 boys were named Eda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,185 US babies named Eda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,984
- Babies named Eda since 1880
- 4,185
- Most popular year
- 1916
- 100 babies
Boys and girls named Eda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 305 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 380 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 296 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 685 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 706 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 360 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 293 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 276 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 153 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 97 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 92 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 106 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 144 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 185 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,984 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,796 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,507 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,446 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,916 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,850 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,503 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,418 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,487 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,882 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,083 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,701 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,323 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,993 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,995 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,379 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,999 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,162 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,868 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,919 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,435 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,619 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,593 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,434 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,285 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,726 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,393 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,416 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,908 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,848 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,040 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,654 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,755 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,485 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,002 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,917 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,619 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,940 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,155 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,586 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,924 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,673 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,345 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,941 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,846 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,484 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,699 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,675 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,031 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,697 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,874 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,222 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,920 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,131 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,872 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,525 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,604 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,083 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,937 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,564 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,205 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,872 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,125 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,304 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,403 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,082 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,015 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,124 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,538 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,715 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,654 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,815 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,802 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,714 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,681 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,552 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,659 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,629 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,877 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,234 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,639 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,620 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,558 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,436 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,420 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,365 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,273 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,365 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,222 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,145 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,037 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,109 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 55 | #996 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 58 | #944 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 57 | #985 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,044 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 74 | #863 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 68 | #897 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 73 | #881 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 80 | #820 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 90 | #771 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 80 | #824 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 72 | #852 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 92 | #729 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 98 | #726 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 88 | #749 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 100 | #685 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 71 | #781 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 56 | #770 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 67 | #629 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 49 | #717 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 33 | #757 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 31 | #773 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 20 | #915 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 35 | #653 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 35 | #633 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 28 | #694 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 29 | #657 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 30 | #632 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 27 | #642 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 32 | #583 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 24 | #648 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 36 | #583 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 29 | #568 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 34 | #546 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 33 | #512 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 47 | #420 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 43 | #433 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 36 | #464 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 32 | #476 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 46 | #391 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 41 | #389 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 39 | #406 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 31 | #432 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 40 | #380 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 25 | #449 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 37 | #352 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 42 | #313 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 35 | #333 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 19 | #439 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 31 | #319 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 23 | #342 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 22 | #342 |
Highest rank
Eda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #313 in 1885. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.