Is Gustav a boy or girl name?
Gustav is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 35 boys were named Gustav, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,237 US babies named Gustav were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,340
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Gustav since 1880
- 4,237
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 99 babies
Boys and girls named Gustav, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 325 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 218 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 166 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 723 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 612 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 339 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 239 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 195 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 171 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 149 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 143 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 207 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 296 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 285 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 169 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35 | #3,340 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 33 | #3,495 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 30 | #3,718 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 34 | #3,381 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 37 | #3,092 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 45 | #2,776 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 33 | #3,402 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 33 | #3,406 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 28 | #3,811 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 23 | #4,337 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 19 | #4,938 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 21 | #4,519 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 27 | #3,831 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 29 | #3,631 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 27 | #3,849 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 43 | #2,815 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 38 | #3,070 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 24 | #4,165 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 33 | #3,251 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 26 | #3,652 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 26 | #3,564 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 24 | #3,660 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 29 | #3,133 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 35 | #2,709 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 18 | #4,275 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 19 | #3,892 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 22 | #3,426 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 19 | #3,649 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 28 | #2,703 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 21 | #3,233 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 22 | #3,154 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 14 | #4,321 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 22 | #3,041 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 23 | #2,860 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 17 | #3,505 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,119 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 16 | #3,261 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 15 | #3,252 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,719 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 17 | #2,876 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 11 | #3,791 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,484 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 8 | #4,756 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 19 | #2,524 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 20 | #2,475 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,430 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 20 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 16 | #2,705 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 17 | #2,542 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,575 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,600 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,092 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 15 | #2,470 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 10 | #3,235 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 17 | #2,238 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 13 | #2,470 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 25 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 14 | #2,186 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 19 | #1,781 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 12 | #2,466 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 19 | #1,859 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 11 | #2,576 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 22 | #1,759 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 18 | #1,936 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,885 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 17 | #1,978 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 15 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 25 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 8 | #3,062 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 26 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 17 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 24 | #1,564 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 20 | #1,696 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 24 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 26 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 17 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 31 | #1,328 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 31 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 13 | #1,968 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 16 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 22 | #1,505 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,439 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 30 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 22 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 25 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 28 | #1,275 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 26 | #1,306 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 24 | #1,406 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 49 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 42 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 30 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 42 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 51 | #950 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 55 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 57 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 53 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 77 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 50 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 62 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 61 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 64 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 73 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 60 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 83 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 90 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 99 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 97 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 92 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 74 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 70 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 68 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 28 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 22 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 17 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 22 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 13 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 14 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 22 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 16 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 15 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 13 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 15 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 19 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 18 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 23 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 16 | #504 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 33 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 19 | #463 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 19 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 21 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 25 | #381 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 23 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 21 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 27 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 30 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 34 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 32 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 28 | #323 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 36 | #291 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 44 | #242 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 43 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 18 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 33 | #286 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Gustav reached #242 in 1883. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Gustav
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.