Is Webster a boy or girl name?
Webster is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 11 boys were named Webster, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,446 US babies named Webster were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,686
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Webster since 1880
- 4,446
- Most popular year
- 1915
- 101 babies
Boys and girls named Webster, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 153 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 193 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 677 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 746 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 508 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 457 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 442 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 269 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 187 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 258 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 151 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 94 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 115 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 48 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | #7,686 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 8 | #9,687 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 17 | #5,616 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 12 | #7,009 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 14 | #6,386 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 17 | #5,529 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,790 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 16 | #5,776 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 7 | #10,571 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 13 | #6,606 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 12 | #6,995 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 10 | #8,112 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,728 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 8 | #9,643 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 5 | #14,404 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 10 | #8,286 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 7 | #10,863 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 8 | #9,545 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 5 | #13,274 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 14 | #5,793 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 5 | #12,688 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 16 | #4,901 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 8 | #8,305 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 16 | #4,776 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 15 | #4,751 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 13 | #5,149 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 17 | #4,051 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 8 | #7,110 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 9 | #6,388 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 21 | #3,320 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 17 | #3,811 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 14 | #4,314 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 19 | #3,321 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 18 | #3,458 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 23 | #2,777 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 26 | #2,362 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 24 | #2,395 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 26 | #2,223 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 32 | #1,865 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 54 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 23 | #2,270 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 11 | #3,957 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 27 | #2,034 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,605 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 13 | #3,347 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 22 | #2,202 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 18 | #2,552 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 17 | #2,593 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 18 | #2,448 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 17 | #2,456 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 24 | #1,870 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 20 | #2,075 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 22 | #1,984 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 16 | #2,394 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 26 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 22 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 21 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 22 | #1,684 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 20 | #1,805 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 38 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 31 | #1,424 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 34 | #1,364 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 20 | #1,871 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 35 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 34 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 45 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 45 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 51 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 39 | #1,216 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 44 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 48 | #1,056 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 43 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 48 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 45 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 55 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 42 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 51 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 54 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 35 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 55 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 39 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 37 | #1,138 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 51 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 38 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 42 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 49 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 51 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 46 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 49 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 57 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 55 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 53 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 57 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 49 | #975 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 57 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 69 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 57 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 68 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 80 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 86 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 85 | #705 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 89 | #695 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 70 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 85 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 87 | #668 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 85 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 77 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 100 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 101 | #568 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 72 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 56 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 49 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 31 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 19 | #705 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 16 | #712 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 24 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 23 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 26 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 18 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 14 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 15 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 20 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 14 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 23 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 12 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 22 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 10 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 15 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 16 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 20 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 13 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 12 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 11 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 22 | #388 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 16 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 19 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 11 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 17 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 14 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 16 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 20 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 17 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 13 | #522 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Webster reached #388 in 1890. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Webster
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.