Is Clem a boy or girl name?
Clem was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 1.2% of the 4,329 US babies named Clem were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Clem since 1880
- 4,329
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 109 babies
Boys and girls named Clem, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 298 | 5 | 1.7% |
| 1890s | 267 | 16 | 5.7% |
| 1900s | 221 | 5 | 2.2% |
| 1910s | 719 | 17 | 2.3% |
| 1920s | 845 | 11 | 1.3% |
| 1930s | 551 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 499 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 355 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 244 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 87 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 32 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 26 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 20 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,283 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 5 | #12,426 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,051 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 7 | #10,063 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 6 | #10,915 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 8 | #7,657 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 5 | #10,654 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 7 | #7,086 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 5 | #8,950 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 5 | #8,636 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 9 | #5,586 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,338 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,117 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 9 | #4,853 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 8 | #5,048 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 12 | #3,631 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 10 | #3,974 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,440 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 9 | #4,290 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 13 | #3,249 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 8 | #4,570 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 10 | #3,853 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 11 | #3,435 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 10 | #3,649 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,766 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 12 | #3,104 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #2,980 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 5 | #5,226 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 13 | #2,685 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 14 | #2,584 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 15 | #2,414 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 23 | #1,740 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 14 | #2,218 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 19 | #1,819 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 17 | #1,903 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 21 | #1,728 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 35 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 25 | #1,595 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 16 | #2,053 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 31 | #1,441 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 43 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 29 | #1,469 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 35 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 45 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 37 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 30 | #1,401 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 34 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 46 | #1,077 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 27 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 35 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 37 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 51 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 46 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 55 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 63 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 44 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 53 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 49 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 47 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 46 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 45 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 45 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 49 | #898 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 48 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 50 | #864 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 49 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 66 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 65 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 60 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 49 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 70 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 71 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 71 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 92 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 79 | #717 | 6 | #4,401 |
| 1925 | 88 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 97 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 78 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 98 | #648 | 5 | #5,154 |
| 1921 | 71 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 100 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 92 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 94 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 102 | #589 | 7 | #3,790 |
| 1916 | 92 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 92 | #595 | 5 | #4,406 |
| 1914 | 84 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 51 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 66 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 23 | #651 | 5 | #2,539 |
| 1910 | 23 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 28 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 24 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 25 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 12 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 27 | #415 | 5 | #1,993 |
| 1904 | 17 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 18 | #508 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 25 | #404 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 17 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 28 | #424 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 22 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 24 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 28 | #355 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 27 | #368 | 5 | #1,630 |
| 1895 | 28 | #347 | 5 | #1,640 |
| 1894 | 24 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 28 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 39 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 22 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 25 | #351 | 6 | #1,238 |
| 1889 | 41 | #260 | 5 | #1,322 |
| 1888 | 29 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 32 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 25 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 34 | #284 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 32 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 31 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 34 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 18 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 22 | #363 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Clem reached #260 in 1889. As a girl name, it reached #1,238 in 1890. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Clem
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.