Is Clement a boy or girl name?
Clement is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 63 boys were named Clement, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 14,109 US babies named Clement were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,260
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Clement since 1880
- 14,109
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 344 babies
Boys and girls named Clement, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 242 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 317 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 442 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 2,332 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 2,842 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,845 | 6 | 0.3% |
| 1940s | 1,562 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,283 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 792 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 498 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 440 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 392 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 390 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 442 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 284 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 57 | #2,394 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 55 | #2,495 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 60 | #2,304 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 49 | #2,591 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 49 | #2,630 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 43 | #2,807 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 56 | #2,324 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 52 | #2,441 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 44 | #2,728 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 43 | #2,760 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 42 | #2,773 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 40 | #2,910 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 34 | #3,252 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 39 | #2,968 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 28 | #3,736 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 44 | #2,757 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 45 | #2,691 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 35 | #3,099 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 53 | #2,245 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 36 | #2,851 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 34 | #2,859 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 44 | #2,343 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 43 | #2,312 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 28 | #3,087 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 36 | #2,470 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 32 | #2,605 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 44 | #2,031 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 33 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 33 | #2,360 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 41 | #2,020 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 46 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 43 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 48 | #1,701 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 36 | #2,052 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 46 | #1,685 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 42 | #1,675 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 31 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 40 | #1,620 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 47 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 41 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 52 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 45 | #1,422 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 44 | #1,436 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 52 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 59 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 41 | #1,453 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 47 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 40 | #1,414 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 43 | #1,323 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 47 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 50 | #1,166 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 54 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 52 | #1,138 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 65 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 60 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 58 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 70 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 64 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 85 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 79 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 86 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 86 | #818 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 110 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 94 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 129 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 106 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 129 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 135 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 140 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 137 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 119 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 123 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 139 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 126 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 121 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 136 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 152 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 151 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 136 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 156 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 170 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 192 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 188 | #428 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 160 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 160 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 158 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 188 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 161 | #443 | 6 | #3,772 |
| 1935 | 175 | #418 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 182 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 179 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 183 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 230 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 229 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 230 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 258 | #360 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 260 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 278 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 293 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 287 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 311 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 317 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 300 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 308 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 294 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 344 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 303 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 333 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 320 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 232 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 193 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 172 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 90 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 51 | #359 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 64 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 41 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 56 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 45 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 38 | #323 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 43 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 37 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 42 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 28 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 48 | #301 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 32 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 30 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 41 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 32 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 28 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 34 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 28 | #333 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 30 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 35 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 27 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 27 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 32 | #314 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 34 | #278 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 26 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 9 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 22 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 31 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 23 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 22 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 16 | #445 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Clement reached #267 in 1912. As a girl name, it reached #3,772 in 1936. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Clement
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.