Is Earle a boy or girl name?
Earle was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 2.4% of the 11,790 US babies named Earle were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Earle since 1880
- 11,790
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 358 babies
Boys and girls named Earle, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 335 | 6 | 1.8% |
| 1890s | 479 | 22 | 4.4% |
| 1900s | 430 | 28 | 6.1% |
| 1910s | 2,210 | 87 | 3.8% |
| 1920s | 2,805 | 81 | 2.8% |
| 1930s | 1,627 | 37 | 2.2% |
| 1940s | 1,345 | 24 | 1.8% |
| 1950s | 1,027 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 567 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 328 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 208 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 92 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 6 | #11,106 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,798 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 7 | #10,167 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 5 | #11,948 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 7 | #9,203 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 7 | #8,928 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 10 | #6,677 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 5 | #10,871 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 10 | #5,952 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 5 | #9,697 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 6 | #8,245 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 7 | #7,224 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 5 | #9,231 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,466 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 19 | #3,373 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 14 | #4,069 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 16 | #3,653 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 21 | #2,928 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,109 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,387 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 24 | #2,312 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 15 | #3,114 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 24 | #2,187 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 24 | #2,159 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 18 | #2,624 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 29 | #1,911 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 22 | #2,299 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 29 | #1,879 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 27 | #1,884 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 23 | #2,083 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 31 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 31 | #1,597 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 34 | #1,472 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 32 | #1,515 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 55 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 37 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 43 | #1,207 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 57 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 52 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 58 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 50 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 53 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 53 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 61 | #975 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 72 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 68 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 92 | #799 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 94 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 84 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 91 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 111 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 101 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 108 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 100 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 132 | #614 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 114 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 119 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 148 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 143 | #566 | 5 | #5,533 |
| 1946 | 132 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 109 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 138 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 158 | #493 | 7 | #3,907 |
| 1942 | 141 | #518 | 7 | #3,846 |
| 1941 | 130 | #521 | 5 | #4,591 |
| 1940 | 127 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 121 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 117 | #539 | 10 | #2,781 |
| 1937 | 145 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 150 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 166 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 170 | #431 | 7 | #3,559 |
| 1933 | 169 | #420 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 199 | #400 | 7 | #3,667 |
| 1931 | 178 | #424 | 7 | #3,582 |
| 1930 | 212 | #395 | 6 | #4,171 |
| 1929 | 260 | #348 | 10 | #2,982 |
| 1928 | 260 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 254 | #366 | 10 | #3,116 |
| 1926 | 237 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 280 | #352 | 11 | #2,989 |
| 1924 | 290 | #346 | 10 | #3,200 |
| 1923 | 277 | #355 | 8 | #3,727 |
| 1922 | 267 | #367 | 13 | #2,652 |
| 1921 | 331 | #320 | 12 | #2,815 |
| 1920 | 349 | #307 | 7 | #4,079 |
| 1919 | 283 | #336 | 13 | #2,550 |
| 1918 | 350 | #293 | 8 | #3,591 |
| 1917 | 328 | #286 | 10 | #2,941 |
| 1916 | 276 | #314 | 14 | #2,279 |
| 1915 | 307 | #282 | 11 | #2,579 |
| 1914 | 194 | #327 | 13 | #1,932 |
| 1913 | 194 | #284 | 6 | #2,918 |
| 1912 | 141 | #307 | 7 | #2,446 |
| 1911 | 83 | #290 | 5 | #2,568 |
| 1910 | 54 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 51 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 46 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 50 | #302 | 7 | #1,682 |
| 1906 | 43 | #317 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 33 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 50 | #270 | 6 | #1,711 |
| 1903 | 33 | #332 | 9 | #1,235 |
| 1902 | 44 | #285 | 6 | #1,654 |
| 1901 | 34 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 46 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 43 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 49 | #253 | 6 | #1,555 |
| 1897 | 37 | #301 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 53 | #251 | 5 | #1,646 |
| 1895 | 53 | #247 | 6 | #1,467 |
| 1894 | 55 | #232 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 54 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 51 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 41 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 43 | #261 | 5 | #1,389 |
| 1889 | 47 | #238 | 6 | #1,174 |
| 1888 | 41 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 39 | #257 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 46 | #252 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 23 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 38 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 33 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 22 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 21 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 25 | #342 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Earle reached #232 in 1894. As a girl name, it reached #1,174 in 1889. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Earle
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.