Is Lona a boy or girl name?
Lona is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 13 girls and 0 boys were named Lona, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 10,912 US babies named Lona were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #8,206
- Babies named Lona since 1880
- 10,912
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 198 babies
Boys and girls named Lona, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 381 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 738 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 926 | 100% |
| 1910s | 6 | 1,491 | 99.6% |
| 1920s | 11 | 1,390 | 99.2% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,193 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,324 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,171 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 946 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 503 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 296 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 120 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 188 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 150 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 78 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,206 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,757 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,157 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,304 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,515 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,907 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,277 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,114 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,457 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,143 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,308 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,697 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,042 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,135 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,794 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,221 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,257 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,224 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,040 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,784 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,659 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,205 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,107 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,112 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,838 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,018 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,337 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,684 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,247 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,213 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,396 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,431 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,466 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,420 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,251 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,449 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,409 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,788 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,417 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,837 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,473 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,578 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,987 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,247 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,232 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,603 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,454 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,079 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,278 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,304 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,928 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,898 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,510 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,372 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,298 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,186 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,168 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,185 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,279 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,192 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 116 | #993 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 130 | #926 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,122 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,094 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,108 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,056 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,178 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,006 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 120 | #924 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 114 | #923 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 136 | #808 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 125 | #830 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 129 | #797 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 125 | #797 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 130 | #759 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 141 | #717 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 128 | #756 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 148 | #694 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 120 | #745 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 109 | #715 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 128 | #657 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 147 | #627 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 129 | #660 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 130 | #620 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 144 | #584 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 99 | #683 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 112 | #648 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 103 | #671 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 119 | #603 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 131 | #559 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 180 | #477 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 131 | #561 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 116 | #613 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 100 | #666 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 102 | #681 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 121 | #626 |
| 1928 | 6 | #3,963 | 114 | #656 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,541 | 132 | #620 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 117 | #670 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 148 | #596 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 156 | #592 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 142 | #618 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 127 | #651 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 165 | #556 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 168 | #552 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 184 | #495 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 198 | #482 |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,801 | 159 | #531 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 173 | #488 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 160 | #487 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 139 | #462 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 140 | #417 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 124 | #418 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 104 | #397 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 110 | #372 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 109 | #345 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 83 | #401 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 100 | #357 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 87 | #361 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 85 | #369 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 89 | #347 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 90 | #331 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 95 | #319 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 85 | #329 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 103 | #334 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 84 | #327 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 93 | #324 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 82 | #323 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 72 | #343 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 78 | #323 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 61 | #357 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 73 | #316 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 72 | #317 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 54 | #343 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 69 | #299 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 62 | #311 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 56 | #323 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 41 | #335 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 39 | #343 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 32 | #359 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 29 | #373 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 34 | #303 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 33 | #310 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 27 | #305 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 28 | #302 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lona reached #3,801 in 1917. As a girl name, it reached #299 in 1890. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lona
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.