Is Lonie a boy or girl name?
Lonie was used for both, more often for girls in the US. Across 1880–2024, 60.9% of the 2,755 US babies named Lonie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lonie since 1880
- 2,755
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 76 babies
Boys and girls named Lonie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 71 | 129 | 64.5% |
| 1890s | 90 | 244 | 73.1% |
| 1900s | 91 | 244 | 72.8% |
| 1910s | 179 | 352 | 66.3% |
| 1920s | 221 | 273 | 55.3% |
| 1930s | 129 | 136 | 51.3% |
| 1940s | 89 | 93 | 51.1% |
| 1950s | 88 | 94 | 51.6% |
| 1960s | 63 | 68 | 51.9% |
| 1970s | 42 | 12 | 22.2% |
| 1980s | 10 | 32 | 76.2% |
| 1990s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 5 | #8,962 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,620 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,985 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,724 |
| 1982 | 5 | #6,965 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,370 |
| 1980 | 5 | #6,866 | 9 | #7,127 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 5 | #6,391 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,128 |
| 1976 | 5 | #6,132 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,971 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 5 | #5,688 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,449 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,715 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 11 | #2,998 | 6 | #7,583 |
| 1969 | 9 | #3,224 | 6 | #7,097 |
| 1968 | 7 | #3,548 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 7 | #3,434 | 8 | #5,241 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,704 |
| 1965 | 8 | #3,139 | 7 | #5,571 |
| 1964 | 7 | #3,479 | 7 | #5,785 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,115 |
| 1962 | 5 | #4,405 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 12 | #2,488 | 12 | #3,908 |
| 1960 | 8 | #3,233 | 11 | #4,067 |
| 1959 | 11 | #2,613 | 14 | #3,357 |
| 1958 | 9 | #2,946 | 15 | #3,173 |
| 1957 | 9 | #2,936 | 8 | #4,745 |
| 1956 | 11 | #2,581 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,190 | 7 | #5,000 |
| 1954 | 7 | #3,326 | 5 | #6,240 |
| 1953 | 8 | #3,057 | 10 | #3,856 |
| 1952 | 6 | #3,585 | 13 | #3,126 |
| 1951 | 6 | #3,577 | 12 | #3,216 |
| 1950 | 7 | #3,204 | 10 | #3,573 |
| 1949 | 12 | #2,291 | 11 | #3,299 |
| 1948 | 6 | #3,534 | 13 | #2,899 |
| 1947 | 10 | #2,595 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 7 | #3,071 | 9 | #3,550 |
| 1945 | 9 | #2,508 | 6 | #4,311 |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,015 | 9 | #3,266 |
| 1943 | 12 | #2,241 | 13 | #2,643 |
| 1942 | 11 | #2,340 | 13 | #2,612 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,800 |
| 1940 | 15 | #1,860 | 12 | #2,503 |
| 1939 | 9 | #2,554 | 13 | #2,366 |
| 1938 | 13 | #2,052 | 11 | #2,673 |
| 1937 | 16 | #1,800 | 16 | #2,052 |
| 1936 | 10 | #2,390 | 11 | #2,615 |
| 1935 | 11 | #2,344 | 17 | #1,966 |
| 1934 | 12 | #2,201 | 10 | #2,847 |
| 1933 | 12 | #2,174 | 7 | #3,616 |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,757 | 16 | #2,090 |
| 1931 | 8 | #2,999 | 15 | #2,162 |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,677 | 20 | #1,846 |
| 1929 | 15 | #2,060 | 15 | #2,257 |
| 1928 | 25 | #1,500 | 12 | #2,700 |
| 1927 | 23 | #1,624 | 20 | #1,985 |
| 1926 | 24 | #1,543 | 24 | #1,753 |
| 1925 | 18 | #1,910 | 31 | #1,487 |
| 1924 | 27 | #1,474 | 35 | #1,392 |
| 1923 | 15 | #2,187 | 33 | #1,417 |
| 1922 | 15 | #2,195 | 34 | #1,393 |
| 1921 | 33 | #1,289 | 33 | #1,423 |
| 1920 | 26 | #1,485 | 36 | #1,298 |
| 1919 | 32 | #1,256 | 44 | #1,113 |
| 1918 | 19 | #1,801 | 38 | #1,224 |
| 1917 | 17 | #1,871 | 42 | #1,105 |
| 1916 | 16 | #1,904 | 37 | #1,180 |
| 1915 | 18 | #1,694 | 37 | #1,131 |
| 1914 | 20 | #1,374 | 44 | #883 |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,635 | 30 | #993 |
| 1912 | 19 | #1,079 | 27 | #992 |
| 1911 | 16 | #849 | 23 | #914 |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,087 | 30 | #788 |
| 1909 | 10 | #991 | 17 | #1,006 |
| 1908 | 7 | #1,172 | 26 | #761 |
| 1907 | 9 | #969 | 22 | #808 |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,194 | 19 | #862 |
| 1905 | 7 | #1,044 | 22 | #792 |
| 1904 | 11 | #746 | 30 | #636 |
| 1903 | 7 | #973 | 21 | #747 |
| 1902 | 8 | #895 | 22 | #744 |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,011 | 28 | #595 |
| 1900 | 20 | #546 | 37 | #574 |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,148 | 18 | #778 |
| 1898 | 11 | #689 | 34 | #550 |
| 1897 | 9 | #763 | 24 | #636 |
| 1896 | 10 | #758 | 29 | #573 |
| 1895 | 12 | #629 | 25 | #616 |
| 1894 | 12 | #614 | 20 | #674 |
| 1893 | 9 | #740 | 29 | #518 |
| 1892 | 12 | #623 | 24 | #573 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 15 | #712 |
| 1890 | 10 | #649 | 26 | #515 |
| 1889 | 14 | #514 | 15 | #674 |
| 1888 | 6 | #999 | 29 | #463 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 22 | #481 |
| 1886 | 10 | #626 | 17 | #548 |
| 1885 | 6 | #891 | 14 | #595 |
| 1884 | 8 | #733 | 7 | #895 |
| 1883 | 5 | #985 | 14 | #532 |
| 1882 | 9 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #832 | 11 | #524 |
| 1880 | 7 | #782 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lonie reached #514 in 1889. As a girl name, it reached #463 in 1888. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lonie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.