Is Lanie a boy or girl name?
Lanie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 110 girls and 0 boys were named Lanie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.4% of the 5,554 US babies named Lanie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,826
- Babies named Lanie since 1880
- 5,554
- Most popular year
- 2006
- 225 babies
Boys and girls named Lanie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 59 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 75 | 100% |
| 1910s | 10 | 131 | 92.9% |
| 1920s | 0 | 121 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 59 | 100% |
| 1940s | 15 | 101 | 87.1% |
| 1950s | 5 | 101 | 95.3% |
| 1960s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 1970s | 5 | 230 | 97.9% |
| 1980s | 0 | 271 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 632 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,810 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,237 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 492 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,826 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,186 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,076 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,961 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,889 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,856 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,907 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,047 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,280 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,969 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,813 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,626 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,725 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 193 | #1,239 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,294 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,486 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,316 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 207 | #1,212 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 225 | #1,117 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 212 | #1,117 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 201 | #1,138 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 209 | #1,069 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,222 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,408 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,581 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,777 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,444 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,378 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,411 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,297 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,396 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,702 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,043 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,759 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,981 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,463 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,099 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,058 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,089 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,065 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,081 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,821 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,481 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,818 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,412 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,394 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,901 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,144 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,884 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,248 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,468 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,178 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,638 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,314 |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,126 | 30 | #2,480 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,014 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,914 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,560 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,209 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,841 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,305 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,717 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,521 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,392 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,449 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,345 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,833 |
| 1957 | 5 | #4,295 | 13 | #3,401 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,659 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,476 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,131 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,096 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,217 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,204 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,534 |
| 1949 | 5 | #3,990 | 9 | #3,759 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,480 |
| 1947 | 5 | #4,019 | 11 | #3,357 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,679 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,679 |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,694 | 10 | #3,048 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,368 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,099 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,200 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,860 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,093 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,556 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,315 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,645 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,987 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,754 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,496 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,509 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,053 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,451 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,077 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,260 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,241 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,602 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,412 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,878 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,274 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,217 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,506 | 14 | #2,443 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,067 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,488 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,574 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,128 | 14 | #2,191 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,695 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,636 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,781 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,719 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,572 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,537 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,763 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,725 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,376 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,609 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,425 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,505 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,706 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,276 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,651 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,332 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,319 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,324 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,495 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 11 | #979 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,051 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,364 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,425 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 9 | #929 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 9 | #925 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 8 | #905 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #991 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 5 | #983 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 6 | #795 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lanie reached #3,694 in 1944. As a girl name, it reached #795 in 1880. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lanie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.