Is Hurley a boy or girl name?
Hurley was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 2.9% of the 2,659 US babies named Hurley were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #8,553
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hurley since 1881
- 2,659
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 54 babies
Boys and girls named Hurley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 36 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 74 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 76 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 287 | 11 | 3.7% |
| 1920s | 406 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 395 | 12 | 2.9% |
| 1940s | 338 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 93 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 69 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 93 | 15 | 13.9% |
| 2010s | 204 | 40 | 16.4% |
| 2020s | 61 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 | #8,553 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 13 | #6,665 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 9 | #8,561 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 16 | #5,630 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 14 | #6,089 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 6 | #11,285 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 13 | #6,489 | 5 | #16,587 |
| 2017 | 18 | #5,175 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 15 | #5,888 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 25 | #4,121 | 6 | #15,214 |
| 2014 | 19 | #4,943 | 6 | #15,319 |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,110 | 10 | #10,539 |
| 2012 | 30 | #3,573 | 5 | #17,849 |
| 2011 | 37 | #3,072 | 8 | #12,601 |
| 2010 | 17 | #5,339 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 28 | #3,760 | 10 | #10,965 |
| 2008 | 24 | #4,183 | 5 | #18,556 |
| 2007 | 23 | #4,281 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 5 | #12,743 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 7 | #9,490 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 6 | #10,456 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 5 | #9,838 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 6 | #8,189 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 8 | #6,348 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,514 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 8 | #5,855 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,401 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 8 | #5,146 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,620 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 6 | #5,867 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 6 | #5,761 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 6 | #5,937 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 10 | #3,962 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 8 | #4,676 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 7 | #4,736 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 5 | #6,233 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,839 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 11 | #3,320 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 9 | #3,675 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,441 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 9 | #3,456 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 11 | #3,041 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 16 | #2,338 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 15 | #2,253 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 13 | #2,380 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 10 | #2,674 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 14 | #2,175 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 20 | #1,789 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 17 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 19 | #1,862 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 12 | #2,432 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 16 | #2,095 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 12 | #2,472 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 17 | #2,005 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 23 | #1,659 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,527 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 38 | #1,239 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 15 | #2,085 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 27 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 36 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 28 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,440 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 38 | #1,172 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 35 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 38 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 49 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 33 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 37 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 29 | #1,295 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 36 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 24 | #1,391 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 31 | #1,218 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 39 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 34 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 45 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 42 | #984 | 6 | #3,956 |
| 1934 | 36 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 34 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 42 | #1,030 | 6 | #4,114 |
| 1931 | 38 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 47 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 39 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 48 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 31 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 54 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 42 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 35 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 46 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 33 | #1,271 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 41 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 37 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 54 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 39 | #1,101 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 43 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 28 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 29 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 36 | #920 | 6 | #3,369 |
| 1913 | 24 | #1,038 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 13 | #1,390 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 11 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,077 | 5 | #2,572 |
| 1909 | 10 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 9 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,440 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 10 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 8 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 11 | #741 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 9 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,235 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #899 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 11 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 9 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 11 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 8 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 9 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 9 | #700 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 6 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 5 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #827 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hurley reached #684 in 1898. As a girl name, it reached #2,572 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Hurley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.