Is Henley a boy or girl name?
Henley is used for both, more often for girls in the US. In 2024, 272 girls and 85 boys were named Henley, so 76.2% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 81.4% of the 7,949 US babies named Henley were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,882
- Girl rank, 2024
- #956
- Babies named Henley since 1912
- 7,949
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 698 babies
Boys and girls named Henley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 39 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 15 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 47 | 59 | 55.7% |
| 2000s | 106 | 265 | 71.4% |
| 2010s | 710 | 4,149 | 85.4% |
| 2020s | 410 | 1,998 | 83% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 85 | #1,882 | 272 | #956 |
| 2023 | 91 | #1,775 | 355 | #792 |
| 2022 | 96 | #1,737 | 394 | #739 |
| 2021 | 74 | #2,007 | 477 | #622 |
| 2020 | 64 | #2,172 | 500 | #583 |
| 2019 | 66 | #2,155 | 502 | #601 |
| 2018 | 73 | #2,001 | 549 | #566 |
| 2017 | 76 | #1,902 | 599 | #521 |
| 2016 | 91 | #1,709 | 607 | #512 |
| 2015 | 104 | #1,556 | 559 | #558 |
| 2014 | 81 | #1,833 | 592 | #521 |
| 2013 | 79 | #1,815 | 319 | #833 |
| 2012 | 53 | #2,394 | 179 | #1,316 |
| 2011 | 42 | #2,820 | 135 | #1,608 |
| 2010 | 45 | #2,701 | 108 | #1,877 |
| 2009 | 21 | #4,642 | 61 | #2,865 |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,198 | 39 | #4,036 |
| 2007 | 8 | #9,204 | 28 | #5,148 |
| 2006 | 12 | #6,615 | 37 | #4,028 |
| 2005 | 13 | #5,991 | 25 | #5,156 |
| 2004 | 20 | #4,319 | 21 | #5,822 |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,120 | 15 | #7,345 |
| 2002 | 5 | #11,322 | 15 | #7,194 |
| 2001 | 5 | #11,201 | 13 | #7,907 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,784 |
| 1999 | 6 | #9,126 | 11 | #8,429 |
| 1998 | 7 | #7,888 | 12 | #7,722 |
| 1997 | 9 | #6,281 | 10 | #8,573 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,999 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,929 |
| 1994 | 6 | #8,134 | 7 | #10,978 |
| 1993 | 7 | #7,095 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 5 | #8,931 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 7 | #6,805 | 5 | #13,948 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 5 | #7,386 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 5 | #7,125 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 5 | #6,659 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 5 | #5,525 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,016 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 5 | #4,291 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 5 | #4,313 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 5 | #4,058 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 5 | #3,932 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 6 | #3,487 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 10 | #2,514 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 5 | #3,969 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 8 | #2,789 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,631 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 6 | #3,296 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 9 | #2,563 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,703 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 5 | #3,888 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 6 | #3,462 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 9 | #2,627 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 8 | #2,964 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,773 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,842 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,918 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,122 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,512 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 8 | #3,375 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 7 | #3,558 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 7 | #3,508 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,739 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 10 | #2,524 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,696 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Henley reached #1,556 in 2015. As a girl name, it reached #512 in 2016. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Henley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.