Is Haley a boy or girl name?
Haley is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 361 girls and 0 boys were named Haley, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.5% of the 160,023 US babies named Haley were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #779
- Babies named Haley since 1890
- 160,023
- Most popular year
- 2000
- 9,100 babies
Boys and girls named Haley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 32 | 100% |
| 1910s | 24 | 70 | 74.5% |
| 1920s | 53 | 78 | 59.5% |
| 1930s | 30 | 33 | 52.4% |
| 1940s | 39 | 22 | 36.1% |
| 1950s | 35 | 12 | 25.5% |
| 1960s | 23 | 376 | 94.2% |
| 1970s | 33 | 2,192 | 98.5% |
| 1980s | 142 | 12,776 | 98.9% |
| 1990s | 240 | 71,198 | 99.7% |
| 2000s | 196 | 57,056 | 99.7% |
| 2010s | 21 | 12,882 | 99.8% |
| 2020s | 0 | 2,415 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 361 | #779 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 425 | #684 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 496 | #603 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 547 | #562 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 586 | #516 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 688 | #452 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 807 | #385 |
| 2017 | 6 | #11,248 | 944 | #343 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 1,011 | #323 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 1,134 | #280 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 1,234 | #267 |
| 2013 | 5 | #12,801 | 1,410 | #229 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 1,710 | #184 |
| 2011 | 5 | #12,973 | 1,957 | #158 |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,934 | 1,987 | #154 |
| 2009 | 6 | #11,484 | 2,625 | #123 |
| 2008 | 9 | #8,538 | 3,342 | #101 |
| 2007 | 8 | #9,195 | 4,200 | #76 |
| 2006 | 10 | #7,621 | 4,298 | #75 |
| 2005 | 16 | #5,108 | 5,128 | #53 |
| 2004 | 47 | #2,391 | 5,728 | #44 |
| 2003 | 18 | #4,497 | 7,198 | #34 |
| 2002 | 23 | #3,711 | 7,457 | #35 |
| 2001 | 28 | #3,175 | 8,011 | #34 |
| 2000 | 31 | #2,882 | 9,069 | #28 |
| 1999 | 24 | #3,307 | 8,202 | #31 |
| 1998 | 20 | #3,630 | 7,934 | #36 |
| 1997 | 19 | #3,650 | 8,687 | #31 |
| 1996 | 30 | #2,559 | 9,042 | #30 |
| 1995 | 20 | #3,359 | 8,209 | #32 |
| 1994 | 22 | #3,156 | 7,803 | #36 |
| 1993 | 41 | #1,974 | 7,618 | #42 |
| 1992 | 23 | #2,939 | 6,040 | #56 |
| 1991 | 21 | #3,042 | 4,463 | #79 |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,102 | 3,200 | #108 |
| 1989 | 21 | #2,938 | 2,362 | #125 |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,126 | 2,004 | #143 |
| 1987 | 15 | #3,254 | 1,557 | #178 |
| 1986 | 19 | #2,720 | 1,278 | #203 |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,538 | 1,378 | #196 |
| 1984 | 12 | #3,544 | 991 | #252 |
| 1983 | 8 | #4,655 | 919 | #259 |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,371 | 1,023 | #245 |
| 1981 | 5 | #6,645 | 774 | #312 |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,488 | 490 | #438 |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,065 | 511 | #414 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 518 | #397 |
| 1977 | 7 | #4,784 | 462 | #442 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,050 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,072 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 129 | #962 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,132 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,212 |
| 1971 | 7 | #4,128 | 85 | #1,296 |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,003 | 74 | #1,411 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,376 |
| 1968 | 5 | #4,360 | 68 | #1,353 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,569 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,703 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,724 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,900 |
| 1963 | 7 | #3,446 | 23 | #2,572 |
| 1962 | 6 | #3,794 | 21 | #2,690 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,239 |
| 1960 | 5 | #4,270 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 6 | #3,754 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,665 |
| 1957 | 5 | #4,217 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 7 | #3,335 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 6 | #3,597 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 6 | #3,579 | 6 | #5,278 |
| 1952 | 5 | #3,954 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 5 | #3,910 | 5 | #5,545 |
| 1948 | 8 | #2,871 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 6 | #3,512 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 6 | #3,135 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 6 | #3,257 | 5 | #4,832 |
| 1943 | 8 | #2,825 | 7 | #3,953 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,908 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,517 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,585 |
| 1937 | 6 | #3,298 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,759 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,480 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,437 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,679 |
| 1931 | 7 | #3,225 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,763 | 6 | #4,257 |
| 1929 | 10 | #2,668 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 6 | #3,893 | 5 | #5,015 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,931 |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,907 | 5 | #5,184 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,504 | 7 | #4,188 |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,119 | 12 | #2,878 |
| 1923 | 8 | #3,281 | 13 | #2,642 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,039 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,815 |
| 1920 | 9 | #3,061 | 6 | #4,618 |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,910 | 8 | #3,607 |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,606 | 5 | #5,137 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,879 |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,313 | 9 | #3,127 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,182 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,509 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,989 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,373 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,957 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,922 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,067 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,200 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,048 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,704 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,113 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,241 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,573 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,225 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,407 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,268 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Haley reached #1,974 in 1993. As a girl name, it reached #28 in 2000. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Haley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.