Is Alois a boy or girl name?
Alois was mostly a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 6.9% of the 2,703 US babies named Alois were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #10,970
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Alois since 1880
- 2,703
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 111 babies
Boys and girls named Alois, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 74 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 695 | 30 | 4.1% |
| 1920s | 635 | 91 | 12.5% |
| 1930s | 419 | 51 | 10.9% |
| 1940s | 225 | 14 | 5.9% |
| 1950s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 65 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 17 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 29 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | #10,970 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 7 | #9,796 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 9 | #8,335 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 7 | #9,765 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 9 | #8,239 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 11 | #7,148 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 7 | #9,739 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 5 | #12,175 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 5 | #12,220 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 5 | #6,303 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 9 | #3,667 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 8 | #3,668 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 8 | #3,321 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 12 | #2,330 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 7 | #3,255 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 7 | #3,295 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 7 | #3,324 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 5 | #4,054 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 9 | #2,903 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 10 | #2,689 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 10 | #2,664 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 8 | #3,036 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 12 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 13 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,767 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 14 | #2,116 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 19 | #1,765 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 12 | #2,252 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 11 | #2,370 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 13 | #2,111 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 13 | #2,124 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 12 | #2,221 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 19 | #1,736 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 14 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 20 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 23 | #1,402 | 7 | #3,695 |
| 1943 | 26 | #1,369 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 30 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 35 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 33 | #1,159 | 7 | #3,512 |
| 1939 | 24 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 30 | #1,199 | 10 | #2,739 |
| 1937 | 33 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 42 | #950 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 40 | #1,011 | 9 | #2,930 |
| 1934 | 36 | #1,093 | 5 | #4,299 |
| 1933 | 37 | #1,078 | 5 | #4,234 |
| 1932 | 64 | #793 | 6 | #3,908 |
| 1931 | 43 | #1,016 | 9 | #2,984 |
| 1930 | 70 | #765 | 7 | #3,673 |
| 1929 | 56 | #888 | 7 | #3,688 |
| 1928 | 52 | #938 | 9 | #3,173 |
| 1927 | 60 | #872 | 8 | #3,566 |
| 1926 | 53 | #933 | 9 | #3,275 |
| 1925 | 56 | #900 | 7 | #4,042 |
| 1924 | 80 | #744 | 16 | #2,311 |
| 1923 | 70 | #792 | 11 | #2,923 |
| 1922 | 64 | #855 | 7 | #4,026 |
| 1921 | 73 | #790 | 9 | #3,412 |
| 1920 | 71 | #793 | 8 | #3,609 |
| 1919 | 84 | #677 | 5 | #4,837 |
| 1918 | 106 | #592 | 5 | #4,834 |
| 1917 | 98 | #599 | 8 | #3,357 |
| 1916 | 104 | #562 | 6 | #3,929 |
| 1915 | 86 | #621 | 6 | #3,802 |
| 1914 | 69 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 54 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 51 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 27 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 16 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 12 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 15 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 14 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 8 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 11 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 15 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #866 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 9 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 12 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 9 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 12 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 6 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 12 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 12 | #524 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 12 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 7 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 8 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 9 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 7 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 9 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 8 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 10 | #601 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Alois reached #524 in 1891. As a girl name, it reached #2,311 in 1924. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.