Is Claud a boy or girl name?
Claud was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 10,940 US babies named Claud were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Claud since 1880
- 10,940
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 350 babies
Boys and girls named Claud, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 881 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 827 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 811 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 2,205 | 12 | 0.5% |
| 1920s | 2,726 | 16 | 0.6% |
| 1930s | 1,394 | 9 | 0.6% |
| 1940s | 947 | 10 | 1% |
| 1950s | 581 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 272 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 135 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 68 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,592 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 7 | #7,084 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,755 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 9 | #5,722 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 6 | #7,429 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 7 | #6,531 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 9 | #5,241 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 6 | #6,559 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,433 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 5 | #6,704 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 5 | #6,479 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,317 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 12 | #3,455 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 11 | #3,657 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 13 | #3,201 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 13 | #3,095 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 10 | #3,648 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 13 | #2,973 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 6 | #4,902 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 11 | #3,170 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 12 | #2,885 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 15 | #2,447 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 22 | #1,929 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 20 | #2,006 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 13 | #2,437 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,432 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 26 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 23 | #1,619 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 26 | #1,521 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 30 | #1,439 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 36 | #1,310 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 21 | #1,769 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 41 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 26 | #1,592 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 45 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 33 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 63 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 47 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 58 | #988 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 67 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 63 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 48 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 79 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 78 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 72 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 89 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 103 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 90 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 73 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 103 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 102 | #628 | 5 | #4,800 |
| 1942 | 101 | #630 | 5 | #4,736 |
| 1941 | 101 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 113 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 92 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 111 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 117 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 127 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 126 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 144 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 145 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 157 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 180 | #420 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 195 | #423 | 9 | #3,101 |
| 1929 | 194 | #422 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 238 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 243 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 254 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 309 | #327 | 5 | #5,103 |
| 1924 | 306 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 295 | #340 | 6 | #4,475 |
| 1922 | 289 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 289 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 309 | #330 | 5 | #5,111 |
| 1919 | 344 | #291 | 6 | #4,346 |
| 1918 | 319 | #317 | 6 | #4,377 |
| 1917 | 293 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 308 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 271 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 187 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 162 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 146 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 97 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 78 | #276 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 73 | #260 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 64 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 82 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 85 | #206 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 90 | #195 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 85 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 77 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 76 | #204 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 72 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 107 | #189 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 68 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 61 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 84 | #183 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 90 | #178 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 88 | #180 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 97 | #158 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 96 | #153 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 78 | #196 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 74 | #176 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 91 | #155 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 88 | #156 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 87 | #172 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 77 | #163 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 96 | #143 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 97 | #139 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 85 | #163 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 91 | #140 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 90 | #153 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 80 | #154 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 90 | #151 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Claud reached #139 in 1885. As a girl name, it reached #3,101 in 1930. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Claud
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.