Is Claudio a boy or girl name?
Claudio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 39 boys were named Claudio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.5% of the 5,471 US babies named Claudio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,102
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Claudio since 1909
- 5,471
- Most popular year
- 1996
- 116 babies
Boys and girls named Claudio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 72 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 210 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 176 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 268 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 510 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 668 | 5 | 0.7% |
| 1980s | 716 | 12 | 1.6% |
| 1990s | 932 | 10 | 1.1% |
| 2000s | 986 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 513 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 207 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39 | #3,102 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 55 | #2,443 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 36 | #3,287 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 33 | #3,437 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 44 | #2,769 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 44 | #2,817 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 51 | #2,516 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 50 | #2,537 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 33 | #3,375 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 55 | #2,361 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 58 | #2,279 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 54 | #2,340 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 52 | #2,420 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 63 | #2,110 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 53 | #2,380 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 80 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 108 | #1,504 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 90 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 112 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 81 | #1,663 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 100 | #1,416 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 97 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 111 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 107 | #1,244 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 100 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 112 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 101 | #1,218 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 100 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 116 | #1,051 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 73 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 97 | #1,156 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 96 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 96 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 72 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 69 | #1,338 | 10 | #8,009 |
| 1989 | 76 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 66 | #1,266 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 78 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 66 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 80 | #1,023 | 6 | #9,536 |
| 1984 | 67 | #1,097 | 6 | #9,365 |
| 1983 | 56 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 59 | #1,212 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 85 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 83 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 75 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 82 | #956 | 5 | #10,044 |
| 1977 | 59 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 57 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 65 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 70 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 55 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 70 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 59 | #1,058 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 76 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 61 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 59 | #948 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 65 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 50 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 40 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 48 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 47 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 53 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 50 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 37 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 35 | #1,325 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 28 | #1,489 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 41 | #1,218 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 33 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 21 | #1,690 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 17 | #1,900 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 26 | #1,484 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 24 | #1,554 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 17 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 26 | #1,439 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 21 | #1,623 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 18 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 30 | #1,338 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 18 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 15 | #1,789 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 18 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 12 | #2,195 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 15 | #1,878 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,102 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 17 | #1,692 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 18 | #1,623 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 19 | #1,587 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 15 | #1,817 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 18 | #1,666 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 14 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 11 | #2,236 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 20 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 29 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,652 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 17 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 16 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 15 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 20 | #1,735 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,692 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 29 | #1,385 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 20 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 28 | #1,403 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 25 | #1,517 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 19 | #1,832 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 15 | #2,076 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,576 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 12 | #2,312 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,233 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 12 | #2,204 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 6 | #2,980 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 9 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Claudio reached #894 in 1967. As a girl name, it reached #8,009 in 1990. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Claudio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.