Is Claudie a boy or girl name?
Claudie was used for both boys and girls in close to equal numbers in the US. Across 1880–2024, 55.7% of the 6,717 US babies named Claudie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Claudie since 1880
- 6,717
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 202 babies
Boys and girls named Claudie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 10 | 138 | 93.2% |
| 1890s | 43 | 264 | 86% |
| 1900s | 105 | 404 | 79.4% |
| 1910s | 471 | 805 | 63.1% |
| 1920s | 788 | 977 | 55.4% |
| 1930s | 655 | 542 | 45.3% |
| 1940s | 448 | 312 | 41.1% |
| 1950s | 272 | 162 | 37.3% |
| 1960s | 116 | 87 | 42.9% |
| 1970s | 49 | 19 | 27.9% |
| 1980s | 16 | 24 | 60% |
| 1990s | 5 | 5 | 50% |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,965 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 5 | #8,633 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,904 |
| 1988 | 5 | #7,478 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,520 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,726 |
| 1983 | 5 | #6,409 | 5 | #10,590 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 6 | #5,645 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 9 | #4,136 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 7 | #4,679 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 7 | #4,524 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,866 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 13 | #2,684 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 7 | #4,039 | 7 | #6,733 |
| 1970 | 6 | #4,325 | 6 | #7,213 |
| 1969 | 14 | #2,328 | 9 | #5,112 |
| 1968 | 12 | #2,468 | 7 | #5,730 |
| 1967 | 8 | #3,038 | 7 | #5,560 |
| 1966 | 7 | #3,292 | 7 | #5,360 |
| 1965 | 17 | #1,930 | 7 | #5,370 |
| 1964 | 10 | #2,693 | 11 | #4,134 |
| 1963 | 10 | #2,703 | 6 | #5,998 |
| 1962 | 12 | #2,396 | 8 | #4,936 |
| 1961 | 12 | #2,434 | 14 | #3,481 |
| 1960 | 14 | #2,225 | 11 | #3,954 |
| 1959 | 18 | #1,918 | 16 | #3,003 |
| 1958 | 13 | #2,279 | 15 | #3,109 |
| 1957 | 28 | #1,492 | 12 | #3,513 |
| 1956 | 22 | #1,684 | 12 | #3,525 |
| 1955 | 20 | #1,735 | 20 | #2,485 |
| 1954 | 28 | #1,439 | 8 | #4,341 |
| 1953 | 26 | #1,483 | 18 | #2,532 |
| 1952 | 41 | #1,153 | 26 | #1,985 |
| 1951 | 42 | #1,111 | 18 | #2,403 |
| 1950 | 34 | #1,236 | 17 | #2,453 |
| 1949 | 38 | #1,147 | 22 | #2,077 |
| 1948 | 28 | #1,382 | 24 | #1,958 |
| 1947 | 44 | #1,097 | 32 | #1,705 |
| 1946 | 34 | #1,200 | 17 | #2,329 |
| 1945 | 36 | #1,086 | 27 | #1,600 |
| 1944 | 57 | #835 | 31 | #1,460 |
| 1943 | 61 | #848 | 42 | #1,254 |
| 1942 | 56 | #880 | 38 | #1,303 |
| 1941 | 43 | #975 | 41 | #1,168 |
| 1940 | 51 | #883 | 38 | #1,188 |
| 1939 | 58 | #802 | 51 | #987 |
| 1938 | 54 | #847 | 53 | #975 |
| 1937 | 58 | #808 | 44 | #1,072 |
| 1936 | 67 | #736 | 41 | #1,098 |
| 1935 | 72 | #717 | 59 | #896 |
| 1934 | 75 | #705 | 56 | #918 |
| 1933 | 69 | #733 | 64 | #837 |
| 1932 | 60 | #822 | 57 | #936 |
| 1931 | 55 | #862 | 58 | #913 |
| 1930 | 87 | #668 | 59 | #951 |
| 1929 | 70 | #765 | 73 | #831 |
| 1928 | 63 | #828 | 80 | #801 |
| 1927 | 87 | #697 | 94 | #736 |
| 1926 | 76 | #732 | 106 | #704 |
| 1925 | 69 | #795 | 110 | #705 |
| 1924 | 77 | #762 | 110 | #709 |
| 1923 | 87 | #693 | 100 | #727 |
| 1922 | 76 | #762 | 98 | #736 |
| 1921 | 90 | #683 | 97 | #742 |
| 1920 | 93 | #660 | 109 | #698 |
| 1919 | 77 | #722 | 103 | #689 |
| 1918 | 72 | #763 | 113 | #674 |
| 1917 | 63 | #795 | 101 | #683 |
| 1916 | 68 | #739 | 104 | #668 |
| 1915 | 51 | #864 | 95 | #677 |
| 1914 | 56 | #679 | 60 | #742 |
| 1913 | 37 | #781 | 63 | #652 |
| 1912 | 20 | #1,031 | 59 | #649 |
| 1911 | 13 | #935 | 51 | #595 |
| 1910 | 14 | #826 | 56 | #544 |
| 1909 | 19 | #620 | 49 | #546 |
| 1908 | 11 | #835 | 47 | #535 |
| 1907 | 10 | #881 | 49 | #512 |
| 1906 | 13 | #684 | 39 | #562 |
| 1905 | 9 | #849 | 28 | #666 |
| 1904 | 7 | #985 | 37 | #546 |
| 1903 | 11 | #707 | 34 | #559 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 31 | #595 |
| 1901 | 15 | #511 | 36 | #510 |
| 1900 | 10 | #852 | 54 | #457 |
| 1899 | 6 | #955 | 30 | #550 |
| 1898 | 8 | #818 | 26 | #635 |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,094 | 24 | #631 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 24 | #639 |
| 1895 | 5 | #1,110 | 32 | #522 |
| 1894 | 8 | #798 | 20 | #667 |
| 1893 | 6 | #932 | 28 | #522 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 28 | #511 |
| 1891 | 5 | #997 | 30 | #471 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 22 | #562 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 22 | #545 |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,065 | 13 | #730 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 14 | #612 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 22 | #463 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 12 | #632 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 16 | #522 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 9 | #656 |
| 1882 | 5 | #964 | 11 | #569 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #691 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 12 | #495 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Claudie reached #511 in 1901. As a girl name, it reached #457 in 1900. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Claudie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.