Is Hilton a boy or girl name?
Hilton is used for both, more often for boys in the US. In 2024, 10 girls and 15 boys were named Hilton, so 40% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.9% of the 6,972 US babies named Hilton were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,985
- Girl rank, 2024
- #9,792
- Babies named Hilton since 1882
- 6,972
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 143 babies
Boys and girls named Hilton, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 56 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 704 | 5 | 0.7% |
| 1920s | 1,204 | 10 | 0.8% |
| 1930s | 918 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 884 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 890 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 592 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 351 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 287 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 254 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 298 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 220 | 11 | 4.8% |
| 2020s | 108 | 34 | 23.9% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15 | #5,985 | 10 | #9,792 |
| 2023 | 20 | #4,942 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 18 | #5,282 | 9 | #10,691 |
| 2021 | 26 | #4,053 | 9 | #10,584 |
| 2020 | 29 | #3,678 | 6 | #14,083 |
| 2019 | 31 | #3,591 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 25 | #4,136 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,899 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 24 | #4,240 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 16 | #5,599 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 21 | #4,599 | 6 | #15,314 |
| 2013 | 20 | #4,690 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 21 | #4,591 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,062 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 29 | #3,660 | 5 | #18,009 |
| 2009 | 23 | #4,338 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 24 | #4,182 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 31 | #3,471 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 33 | #3,253 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 28 | #3,482 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 35 | #2,910 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 22 | #3,887 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 33 | #2,841 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 35 | #2,710 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 34 | #2,696 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 23 | #3,423 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 29 | #2,815 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 28 | #2,784 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 16 | #4,081 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 25 | #2,875 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 18 | #3,657 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 22 | #3,083 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 34 | #2,231 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 29 | #2,430 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 30 | #2,335 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 22 | #2,823 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 34 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 25 | #2,295 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 27 | #2,120 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 32 | #1,845 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 22 | #2,318 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 31 | #1,797 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 29 | #1,910 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 29 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 36 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 38 | #1,544 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 24 | #2,031 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 40 | #1,459 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 23 | #2,080 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 33 | #1,572 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 30 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 30 | #1,598 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 47 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 32 | #1,542 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 54 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 58 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 47 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 38 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 50 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 45 | #1,118 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 62 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 74 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 66 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 64 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 88 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 80 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 82 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 92 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 102 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 80 | #822 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 90 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 73 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 112 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 83 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 96 | #702 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 75 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 100 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 87 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 83 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 85 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 72 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 99 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 93 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 95 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 95 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 97 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 83 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 87 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 59 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 102 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 88 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 99 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 79 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 117 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 107 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 110 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 122 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 111 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 119 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 116 | #580 | 5 | #5,324 |
| 1924 | 135 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 113 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 134 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 106 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 138 | #521 | 5 | #5,309 |
| 1919 | 97 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 112 | #576 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 111 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 102 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 84 | #635 | 5 | #4,573 |
| 1914 | 64 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 48 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 39 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 26 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 21 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 14 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 18 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 15 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 21 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 9 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 10 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 11 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 7 | #1,101 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 8 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 11 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 8 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,160 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 5 | #1,071 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,029 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #1,006 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hilton reached #498 in 1905. As a girl name, it reached #4,573 in 1915. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Hilton
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.