Is Harmon a boy or girl name?
Harmon is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 17 boys were named Harmon, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.5% of the 6,622 US babies named Harmon were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,504
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Harmon since 1880
- 6,622
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 169 babies
Boys and girls named Harmon, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 200 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 185 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 208 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 944 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,280 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 995 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 1940s | 823 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 556 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 341 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 197 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 149 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 275 | 6 | 2.1% |
| 2010s | 225 | 10 | 4.3% |
| 2020s | 103 | 9 | 8% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | #5,504 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 26 | #4,147 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 19 | #5,099 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 24 | #4,292 | 9 | #10,576 |
| 2020 | 17 | #5,326 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 24 | #4,267 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 15 | #5,870 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 19 | #4,996 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 27 | #3,919 | 5 | #17,175 |
| 2015 | 19 | #4,945 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 25 | #4,051 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,106 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 30 | #3,568 | 5 | #17,823 |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,060 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 24 | #4,156 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,383 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 20 | #4,792 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 23 | #4,280 | 6 | #16,197 |
| 2006 | 37 | #2,996 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 25 | #3,757 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 29 | #3,316 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 35 | #2,809 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 36 | #2,658 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 30 | #3,015 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 29 | #3,018 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 30 | #2,823 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 27 | #2,957 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 14 | #4,534 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 11 | #5,317 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 11 | #5,277 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 12 | #4,903 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 6 | #8,007 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 16 | #3,814 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 8 | #6,154 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 14 | #4,055 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 12 | #4,369 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,281 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 11 | #4,071 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,559 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 7 | #5,369 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 10 | #4,029 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 10 | #3,976 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 12 | #3,566 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 17 | #2,712 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 14 | #3,159 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 16 | #2,820 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 21 | #2,237 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 21 | #2,231 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 14 | #2,873 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,576 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 16 | #2,501 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,095 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 25 | #1,791 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 22 | #1,948 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 35 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 23 | #1,745 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 24 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 28 | #1,460 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 29 | #1,435 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 29 | #1,445 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 46 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 31 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 44 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 45 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 42 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 52 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 48 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 44 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 51 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 59 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 56 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 76 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 57 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 61 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 52 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 67 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 72 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 104 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 75 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 73 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 52 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 102 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 80 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 97 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 101 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 72 | #705 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 86 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 92 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 96 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 117 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 92 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 104 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 116 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 98 | #594 | 5 | #4,613 |
| 1930 | 122 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 111 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 114 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 132 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 134 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 112 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 136 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 129 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 115 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 169 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 128 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 143 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 140 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 118 | #539 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 120 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 117 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 95 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 85 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 67 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 31 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 28 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 29 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 32 | #423 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 18 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 14 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 21 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 22 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 17 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 13 | #626 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 19 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 23 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 24 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 19 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 14 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 11 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 15 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 20 | #429 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 18 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 16 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 21 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 27 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 25 | #355 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 18 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 21 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 18 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 19 | #418 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 21 | #389 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 17 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 20 | #404 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 18 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 23 | #358 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Harmon reached #337 in 1890. As a girl name, it reached #4,613 in 1931. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Harmon
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.