Is Leta a boy or girl name?
Leta is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 11 girls and 0 boys were named Leta, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 11,934 US babies named Leta were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #9,267
- Babies named Leta since 1880
- 11,934
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 233 babies
Boys and girls named Leta, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 289 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 666 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 863 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,663 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 2,072 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,587 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,332 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,439 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 864 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 426 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 265 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 156 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 124 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 119 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 69 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,267 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,300 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,794 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,996 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,831 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,971 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,405 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,104 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,822 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,462 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,907 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,665 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,938 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,184 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,381 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,485 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,910 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,315 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,348 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,116 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,249 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,274 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,564 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,330 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,696 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,926 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,549 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,943 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,836 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,587 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,462 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,462 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,288 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,321 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,743 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,248 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,694 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,646 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,759 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,964 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,292 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,678 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,034 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,374 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,134 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,604 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,046 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,237 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,339 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,277 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,782 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,958 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,789 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,793 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,491 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,395 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,366 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,374 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,377 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,186 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,153 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,086 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 129 | #952 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 136 | #906 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,000 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 119 | #949 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 136 | #874 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 136 | #856 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 142 | #812 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 183 | #692 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 170 | #703 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 162 | #702 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 142 | #735 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 137 | #736 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 170 | #637 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 132 | #736 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 153 | #680 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 120 | #744 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 104 | #733 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 135 | #630 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 133 | #659 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 112 | #706 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 139 | #600 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 134 | #604 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 142 | #567 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 146 | #566 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 125 | #603 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 154 | #522 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 150 | #527 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 169 | #495 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 167 | #493 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 159 | #521 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 162 | #512 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 213 | #461 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 191 | #488 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 214 | #469 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 229 | #462 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 225 | #454 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 195 | #505 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 183 | #532 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 204 | #484 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 200 | #487 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 206 | #481 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 225 | #448 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 183 | #497 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 233 | #435 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 196 | #464 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 219 | #424 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 224 | #403 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 153 | #441 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 130 | #434 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 130 | #406 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 98 | #406 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 97 | #401 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 96 | #379 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 83 | #400 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 87 | #380 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 81 | #382 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 98 | #343 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 86 | #353 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 83 | #348 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 82 | #351 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 74 | #354 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 93 | #348 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 60 | #376 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 95 | #322 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 78 | #334 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 76 | #336 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 73 | #335 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 65 | #344 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 55 | #365 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 56 | #355 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 45 | #374 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 63 | #320 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 59 | #319 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 41 | #378 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 32 | #385 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 24 | #444 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 32 | #358 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 22 | #431 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 25 | #369 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 15 | #483 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 21 | #366 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 18 | #397 |
Highest rank
Leta has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #319 in 1889. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Leta
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.